In the last few years, it has become less common for families member to have meals together. For my perspective, this is a positive trend for the development of society and individuals.
On the one hand, the case for family members not eating meals together is beneficial as it engenders more free time to pursue personal pursuits for each individual. It is undeniable that eating alone is often less time-consuming than family meals. Therefore, people can derive a substantial amount of time from enjoying having meals with themselves and devote it to personal businesses and interests. For instance, by dedicating less time to sharing meals with parents and siblings, a senior high-school student can spend time doing his homework and attending extra classes as well as engaging in social activities. As a result, this students is likely to achieve a study-live balance, which allows him to put enough effort into his academic work while still ensuring him have time for social aspects of being a student.
However, with no family meals, members will deprive themselves of valuable opportunities to strengthen their relationship with each other. It is true that modern people are increasingly beset with their duties. Therefore, having meals together seems to be a fundamental occasion for every family member to share with others news. Furthermore, each member can gain a sense of intimacy with another, thus solidifying their connection. To cite an example, a recent survey has found that the frequency of western family having meals together witnessed a decline over the past few decades. This downward trend has accompanied a reduction in communication and feelings of togetherness among Western family members and family bonding become weaken.
In conclusion, with the development of society, it is positive for family member having more free time to do their businesses and hobbies. However, balancing time with family and friends is still essential for everyone
In the last few years, it has become less common for
families
member
to have
meals
together. For my perspective, this is a
positive
trend for the development of society and individuals.
On the one hand, the case for
family
members
not eating
meals
together is beneficial as it engenders more free
time
to pursue personal pursuits for each individual. It is undeniable that eating alone is
often
less time-consuming than
family
meals
.
Therefore
,
people
can derive a substantial amount of
time
from enjoying
having
meals
with themselves and devote it to personal businesses and interests.
For instance
, by dedicating less
time
to sharing
meals
with parents and siblings, a senior high-school student can spend
time
doing his homework and attending extra classes
as well
as engaging in social activities.
As a result
,
this
students is likely to achieve a study-
live
balance, which
allows
him to put
enough
effort into his academic work while
still
ensuring him have
time
for social aspects of being a student.
However
, with no
family
meals
,
members
will deprive themselves of valuable opportunities to strengthen their relationship with each other. It is true that modern
people
are
increasingly
beset with their duties.
Therefore
,
having
meals
together seems to be a fundamental occasion for every
family
member
to share with others news.
Furthermore
, each
member
can gain a sense of intimacy with another,
thus
solidifying their connection. To cite an example, a recent survey has found that the frequency of western
family
having
meals
together witnessed a decline over the past few decades. This downward trend has accompanied a reduction in communication and feelings of togetherness among Western
family
members
and
family
bonding become weaken.
In conclusion
, with the development of society, it is
positive
for
family
member
having
more free
time
to do their businesses and hobbies.
However
, balancing
time
with
family
and friends is
still
essential for everyone