To commence with, there are some disadvantages.
To commence with, there are some disadvantages. j5dpN
To commence with, there are some disadvantages. The predominant one is that public transport cannot help people in critical situations at any time. To be more precise, sometimes people have emergencies to reach quickly on their destinations, public transport is run only at fixed time, however if people have their own vehicle then they use them at any time and the reach on their destination at required time. Thus banning of private vehicle and use of only public transport is not helpful to people in emergency conditions.
Further, shifting towards the advantages, economy of the city would rise with the more usage of public transport. To explain, public transport is related to state government, then its profit means beneficial for government in terms of economy. For example, according to survey done in America in which government banned the use of private vehicle and encourage people to start using public transport instead of private, then after few months American government observed the 25% rise in economy of the country. Hence, public transport plays vital role in making a wealthy country.
Furthermore, the usage of public transport rather than private transport reduce the pollution from the city. In other words, if people use only public vehicle for travelling then more people can travel in one vehicle, whereas if they use private vehicle and go travelling individually, cause more pollution than the single public vehicle. Resultantly, banning of private transport means to save city from pollution problems.
To conclude, although public transport not help people in emergencies, but I think its merits like rise in economy and reduction in pollution of the city clearly outweigh its disadvantages.
To commence with, there are
some
disadvantages. The predominant one is that
public
transport
cannot
help
people
in critical situations at any
time
. To be more precise,
sometimes
people
have emergencies to reach
quickly
on their destinations,
public
transport
is run
only
at
fixed
time
,
however
if
people
have their
own
vehicle
then they
use
them at any
time
and the reach on their destination at required
time
.
Thus
banning of
private
vehicle
and
use
of
only
public
transport
is not helpful to
people
in emergency conditions.
Further
, shifting towards the advantages,
economy
of the city would rise with the more usage of
public
transport
. To
explain
,
public
transport
is related
to state
government
, then its profit means beneficial for
government
in terms of
economy
.
For example
, according to survey done in America in which
government
banned the
use
of
private
vehicle
and encourage
people
to
start
using
public
transport
instead
of
private
, then after few months American
government
observed the 25% rise in
economy
of the country.
Hence
,
public
transport
plays vital role in making a wealthy country.
Furthermore
, the usage of
public
transport
rather
than
private
transport
reduce
the
pollution
from the city.
In other words
, if
people
use
only
public
vehicle
for travelling then more
people
can travel in one
vehicle
, whereas if they
use
private
vehicle
and go travelling
individually
, cause more
pollution
than the single
public
vehicle
.
Resultantly
, banning of
private
transport
means to save city from
pollution
problems.
To conclude
, although
public
transport
not
help
people
in emergencies,
but
I
think
its merits like rise in
economy
and reduction in
pollution
of the city
clearly
outweigh its disadvantages.