Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

- To assess whether consumer compensation preference and brand referral behaviors are impacted by matched (mismatched) recovery efforts

- To assess whether consumer compensation preference and brand referral behaviors are impacted by matched (mismatched) recovery efforts KwlxL
The researchers looked for introductory proof for hypothesis that being rejected (ignored) prompts low (high) construal levels and the impacts of construal level on preference for visual or verbal portrayals. 204 undergraduates students from an American college was randomly allotted to four retail exclusion conditions and to be expected to respond to questions measuring their perception of psychological distance to the experience, the extent they felt accepted/ignored/rejected, and their negative emotional intensity by using Likert scale. To examine the similarity between retail or service contexts and interpersonal contexts, To manipulate actual experience, To investigate the robustness of the proposed construal-level effects by using brand representative. 100 undergraduate students studying in an American college were randomly assigned to either the rejected or ignored condition. Then the researcher measured their perception about the psychological distance of the exclusion experience regarding interaction with brand representative, their interactivity and imagery vividness, and their favors of a Starbucks coupon code. 200 undergraduate students coming from an American university were randomly allocated to four conditions. Then, participants were expected to respond to two exclusion manipulation check questions and to reflect their mood, their powerful feeling, and their financial constraint by answering questions on a 7-point scale. 188 undergraduate students studying in an American university indicated gift card preference and revisit intention when they were received gift card through physical or email address. Then participants rate their experience by using five-point scale on Yelp. com website. The researcher allocated randomly 200 students studying in an American university to the rejected or ignored condition and giving them compensation with coupon codes. Then participants were asked to show their pre-recovery store satisfaction and recovery expectation and to answer questions about recovery satisfaction, post-recovery store satisfaction, and intended loyalty. 100 students studying in an American university were randomly allocated to the rejected or ignored condition and were received an apology, and a coupon code for further purchasing. Then participants were asked to indicate their compensation preference and to report their brand attitudes, pre-recovery satisfaction, and brand referral.
The researchers looked for introductory proof for hypothesis that being
rejected
(
ignored
) prompts low (high) construal levels and the impacts of construal level on preference for visual or verbal portrayals. 204
undergraduates
students
from an American college was
randomly
allotted to four retail exclusion conditions and to be
expected
to respond to
questions
measuring their perception of psychological distance to the
experience
, the extent they felt
accepted
/
ignored
/rejected, and their
negative
emotional intensity by using
Likert
scale. To examine the similarity between retail or service contexts and interpersonal contexts,

To manipulate actual
experience
, To investigate the robustness of the proposed construal-level effects by using
brand
representative. 100
undergraduate
students
studying
in an American college were
randomly
assigned to either the
rejected
or
ignored
condition
. Then the researcher measured their perception about the psychological distance of the exclusion
experience
regarding interaction with
brand
representative, their interactivity and imagery vividness, and their favors of a Starbucks coupon code. 200
undergraduate
students
coming from an American
university
were
randomly
allocated to four conditions. Then,
participants
were
expected
to respond to two exclusion manipulation
check
questions
and to reflect their mood, their powerful feeling, and their financial constraint by answering
questions
on a 7-point scale.

188
undergraduate
students
studying
in an American
university
indicated gift card preference and revisit intention when they
were received
gift card through physical or email address. Then
participants
rate their
experience
by using five-point scale on Yelp.
com
website.

The researcher allocated
randomly
200
students
studying
in an American
university
to the
rejected
or
ignored
condition
and giving them compensation with coupon codes. Then
participants
were asked
to
show
their
pre-recovery
store
satisfaction
and recovery expectation and to answer
questions
about recovery
satisfaction
, post-recovery store
satisfaction
, and intended loyalty.

100
students
studying
in an American
university
were
randomly
allocated to the
rejected
or
ignored
condition
and
were received
an apology, and a coupon code for
further
purchasing. Then
participants
were asked
to indicate their compensation preference and to report their
brand
attitudes,
pre-recovery
satisfaction
, and
brand
referral.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay - To assess whether consumer compensation preference and brand referral behaviors are impacted by matched (mismatched) recovery efforts

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
337 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts