The number of serious offences being reported is growing each year. Some argue that the key solution to this issue is to apply capital punishment, whereas many people claim that other measures should be implemented. I will discuss both points of view in this essay.
The argument for capital punishment being employed to tackle the growing crime rate is that as part of human’s nature is to be scared of death, thus the death penalty deters potential criminals from doing unlawful acts. For example, the Independent, a world-famous newspaper, has once reported that nearly 70% of people in Vietnam never committed a crime in their life, because they are afraid of facing a death sentence. As a result, the crime rates in Vietnam have declined significantly, which has lifted public anxiety about personal safety. Therefore, the quality of life of a society can be hugely improved if capital punishment is used.
However, despite the arguments above, many commentators suggest that other kinds of punishment should be used. The underlying reason is that the recidivist crime rates are very high, thus capital punishment does not act strongly enough to stop people from violating the rules. Oxford University’s recent research shows that approximately 70% of criminals stand a high chance of re-offending after being released. Moreover, most serious offenders are heavy drinkers or drug addicts. Thus, When people take those addictive substances too heavily, they cannot think properly and lose their common sense. Consequently, they commit serious or brutal crimes without thinking they can be sentenced to death, so the death penalty is no deterrent for them. . Furthermore, as a matter of principle, it is immoral for people to execute others, regardless of how evil they are.
In conclusion, in order to address rising rates of crime, some believe capital punishment should be adopted thoroughly, as death is something that frightens most people. Nevertheless, others argue that other punishments should be applied, because a death sentence will not act as a strong deterrent for the vast majority of recidivist criminals.
The number of serious
offences
being reported
is growing each year.
Some
argue that the key solution to this issue is to apply
capital
punishment
, whereas
many
people
claim that
other
measures should
be implemented
. I will discuss both points of view in this essay.
The argument for
capital
punishment
being employed
to tackle the growing
crime
rate
is that as part of human’s nature is to
be scared
of death,
thus
the death penalty deters potential criminals from doing unlawful acts.
For example
, the Independent, a world-
famous
newspaper, has once reported that
nearly
70% of
people
in Vietnam never committed a
crime
in their life,
because
they are afraid of facing a death sentence.
As a result
, the
crime
rates
in Vietnam have declined
significantly
, which has lifted public anxiety about personal safety.
Therefore
, the quality of life of a society can be
hugely
improved
if
capital
punishment
is
used
.
However
, despite the arguments above,
many
commentators suggest that
other
kinds of
punishment
should be
used
. The underlying reason is that the recidivist
crime
rates
are
very
high,
thus
capital
punishment
does not act
strongly
enough
to
stop
people
from violating the
rules
. Oxford University’s recent research
shows
that approximately 70% of criminals stand a high chance of re-offending after
being released
.
Moreover
, most serious offenders are heavy drinkers or drug addicts.
Thus
, When
people
take those addictive substances too
heavily
, they cannot
think
properly
and lose their common sense.
Consequently
, they commit serious or brutal
crimes
without thinking they can
be sentenced
to death,
so
the death penalty is no deterrent for them.
.
Furthermore
, as a matter of principle, it is immoral for
people
to execute others, regardless of how evil they are.
In conclusion
, in order to address rising
rates
of
crime
,
some
believe
capital
punishment
should
be adopted
thoroughly
, as death is something that frightens most
people
.
Nevertheless
, others argue that
other
punishments
should
be applied
,
because
a death sentence will not act as a strong deterrent for the vast majority of recidivist criminals.