There has been much discussion revolving around the issue of whether the government should make tertiary education free for all students. I tend to believe that higher education should be free for the following reason.
The merits of outstanding free university education are apparent. The primary factor we need to take into consideration is that many students cannot afford a university education, although they truly want to get degrees. Obviously, without enough financial resources, these students have to give up their dreams, which is unfair to them. Besides, the government is already wasting taxpayers’ money on projects such as space exploration by making spaceships. The fund should be spent on university education. That is to say, the government would be well-advised to allocate resources in a more sensible way. My belief is that high tuition fees may prevent some students from studying at university. It is widely recognized that many young people are reluctant to face their loans after graduation, which means such a burden might make university education less attractive.
I admit that students’ financial contribution to higher education helps universities to improve facilities and environment it helps to convenient to study, which impact the result of student. Despite that, a more reasonable government fund allocation can solve this issue, for which we can find plenty of evidence from our own experience.
In conclusion, I would argue that tertiary education should be paid for by the government. Accordingly, it would be generally advisable for the government to allocate financial resources in a more beneficial way.
There has been much discussion revolving around the issue of whether the
government
should
make
tertiary
education
free for all
students
. I tend to believe that higher
education
should be free for the following reason.
The merits of outstanding free
university
education
are apparent. The primary factor we need to take into consideration is that
many
students
cannot afford a
university
education
, although they
truly
want to
get
degrees.
Obviously
, without
enough
financial resources, these
students
have to
give up their dreams, which is unfair to them.
Besides
, the
government
is already wasting taxpayers’ money on projects such as space exploration by making spaceships. The fund should
be spent
on
university
education
.
That is
to say, the
government
would be well-advised to allocate resources in a more sensible way. My belief is that high tuition fees may
prevent
some
students
from studying at
university
. It is
widely
recognized that
many
young
people
are reluctant to face their loans after graduation, which means such a burden might
make
university
education
less attractive.
I admit that
students’
financial contribution to higher
education
helps
universities
to
improve
facilities and environment it
helps
to convenient to
study, which impact the result of
student
. Despite that, a more reasonable
government
fund allocation can solve this issue, for which we can find
plenty
of evidence from our
own
experience.
In conclusion
, I would argue that tertiary
education
should
be paid
for by the
government
.
Accordingly
, it would be
generally
advisable for the
government
to allocate financial resources in a more beneficial way.