Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The world has become a safer place than it was hundred years age and the government should stop large amounts of money on the arm forces. To what extend you agree or disagree with this statement

The world has become a safer place than it was hundred years age and the government should stop large amounts of money on the arm forces. To what extend you agree or disagree with this statement bOlXX

In this day and age, putting effort on protecting homeland is playing a crucial role due to existing other national threats. Whether bearing in mind that contemporary world is a better place to decline our investment on military services can be deemed as a debate. In spite of the fact that some might either advocate or refute this notion, I tend to see it as a double-edge sword. Some reasons can be provided to support this belief, the first of which is that central government tend to solve their problems with communications. In other words, they try to put forward their desire to some diplomatic ways in conflict with other nations since they are aware of the war consequences either for their people or the other countries citizens. If one of the politicians goes further from their responsibilities, the others will not take this the whole nation purpose. In order to illustrate, a diplomat was criticized for his behavior in front of other national communities two years ago, and nobody took serious his action. In contrast, some believe that providing protecting should not be neglected, the main argument is that weakness in military forces can lead to losing the government power, which means that safety of the country can be threatened due to the lack of sufficient army forces. Although politicians should not follow violence with their soldiers, having a potent, considerate enforcement is inevitable. For instance, in the last few decades, some small nations decide to destroy their military by devoting less financial resource to them and as a result, they had to pass their possessions to some brutal attackers. In conclusion, having contemplated over all influential factors, I tend to opine that this idea can be both supported to some extent and opposed due to mentioned argument. Therefore, I stand in the middle of the ground.

In this day and age, putting effort on protecting homeland is playing a crucial role due to existing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 national threats. Whether bearing in mind that contemporary world is a better place to decline our investment on military services can be deemed
 as a debate. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:notwithstanding
In spite of
 the fact that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 might either advocate or refute this notion, I tend to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witness
see
 it as a double-edge sword. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
 reasons can be provided
 to support this belief, the first
 of which is that central This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 tend to solve their problems with communications. In You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 words, they try to put forward their desire to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 diplomatic ways in conflict with You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 nations since they are aware of the war consequences either for their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 or the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 countries citizens. If one of the politicians goes further
 from their responsibilities, the others will not take this the whole nation purpose. In order to illustrate, a diplomat was criticized
 for his behavior in front of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 national communities two years ago, and nobody took serious his action. In contrast
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 believe that providing protecting should not be neglected
, the main argument is that weakness in military forces can lead to Did you mean "lose"?lose
losing
 the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 power, which means that safety of the country can be threatened
 due to the lack of sufficient army forces. Although politicians should not follow violence with their soldiers, having a potent, considerate enforcement is inevitable. For instance
, in the last few decades, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
 nations decide to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demolishruin
destroy
 their military by devoting less financial resource to them and as a result
, they had to pass their possessions to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 brutal attackers. In conclusion
, having contemplated over all influential factors, I tend to opine that this This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
 can be both supported to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 extent and opposed due to mentioned argument. Therefore
, I stand in the middle of the ground. 