Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The whole world has now become a global village in this modern era in the light of advancement in technology and rapid-moving means of transports and it is not incorrect if we say only one government can lead entire earth in place of individual government in every country. I agree that merits of this have edge over the demerits.

The whole world has now become a global village in this modern era in the light of advancement in technology and rapid-moving means of transports and it is not incorrect if we say only one government can lead entire earth in place of individual government in every country. I agree that merits of this have edge over the demerits. yD8wr
Firstly, Single ministry can allocate essential resource more accurately and effectively, Source, like medical equipment, natural resource, education facilities. For instance: - Lots of people have died in India during Covid breakout due to lack of oxygen, Although Pakistan was offering instance supply of oxygen cylinder to help Indian people. But Indian government had declined their offer because of bitterly relationship between two countries. Government could have saved so many lives if there would had been common authority in both countries. Secondly, one leadership can control crime rate in better than national government all over the world by implementing same laws everywhere in the world. Due to different national government, some countries have tough laws and others have less penalties for same crime. For example: in Dubai, there is death penalty for rape but in India only 14 years of prison. In addition, government can make better programs to reform criminal by giving them work opportunity as a labour in another part of the world, not locally. Furthermore, situation in Afghanistan is good example of failure of national power in the country. However, every coin has two sides, drawback of having one government can’t be ignored. Firstly, this won’t be easy to manage family of 7. 6 billion people by one government. Secondly, there are countless diverse cultures in the world and people have their needs and satisfaction according to their culture, sentiments and religion which national ministry understand more closely. Also, this would be not fair for people who are paying more tax but getting same facilities as less tax payer. On top of that, keeping an eye out on terror movements will be the biggest challenge for single government for safety of the people and to guard natural resource like oil. In conclusion, one government can work in better way to develop every corner of the world by implementing good strategies of equal distribution and controlling crime by same laws in entire planet. On the other hand, it will be difficult for single authority to manage large population. plus, one governance can’t do justification for people paying more taxes than paying less. Overall, in my opinion, it will be great if we have one governance body to look after entire planet and will be more beneficial for public.
Firstly
, Single ministry can allocate essential resource more
accurately
and
effectively
, Source, like medical equipment, natural resource, education facilities.
For instance
:
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
-
Lots of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
died
in India during
Did you mean "COVID-19" or the alternative spelling "Covid-19" (= coronavirus)?
Covid
breakout due to lack of oxygen, Although Pakistan was offering instance supply of oxygen cylinder to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
Indian
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
Indian
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
had declined their offer
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of
bitterly
relationship between two countries.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Government
could have saved
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
if there would
The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: "have"
had
been common authority in both countries.

Secondly
, one leadership can control crime rate in better than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
national
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
all over the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
by implementing same laws everywhere in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
. Due to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
national
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
countries have tough laws
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
and others
have
Did you mean "fewer"? The noun penalties is countable.
less
penalties for same crime.
For example
: in Dubai, there is death penalty for rape
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
in India
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
14 years of prison.
In addition
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
better programs to reform criminal by giving them work opportunity as a
Possible spelling mistake. 'labour' is British English.
labour
in another part of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
, not
locally
.
Furthermore
, situation in Afghanistan is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
example of failure of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
national
power in the country.

However
, every coin has two sides, drawback of having one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
can’t be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ignored
.
Firstly
, this won’t be easy to manage family of 7. 6 billion
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
by one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
.
Secondly
, there are countless diverse cultures in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
have their needs and satisfaction according to their culture, sentiments and religion which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
national
ministry understand more
closely
.
Also
, this would be not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fair
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who are paying more tax
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
getting same facilities as less tax payer.
On top of that
, keeping an eye out on terror movements will be the biggest challenge for single
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
for safety of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
and to guard natural resource like oil.

In conclusion
, one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
can work in better way to develop every corner of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
by implementing
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
strategies of equal distribution and controlling crime by same laws in entire planet.
On the other hand
, it will be difficult for single authority to manage large population.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
plus
, one governance can’t do justification for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
paying more taxes than paying less.
Overall
, in my opinion, it will be great if we have one governance body to look after entire planet and will be more beneficial for public.

IELTS essay The whole world has now become a global village in this modern era in the light of advancement in technology and rapid-moving means of transports and it is not incorrect if we say only one government can lead entire earth in place of individual government in every country. I agree that merits of this have edge over the demerits.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
380 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • take a holiday in a foreign country
    Taking a holiday in a foreign country has some advantages, but it also can't avoid some drawbacks. When you spend your holidays abroad, you can learn new things that you have never seen before. However, the disadvantages are that you may lose the company of your family and friends, and it will cost ...
  • It is often concidered that change is more beneficial to people than trying to avoid it and have everything remane the same
    Changing is a constant term for whole world. Everything, everyone will be transformed over time, including people also. They will vary till the end of life. Despite some disadvantages that derive from this arrangement, I feel that modification is good and right choice for everybody. This will be sho...
  • cons of outsourcing call center
    Outsourcing is a common practice that allows businesses to tap into the benefit of getting certain skills at reduced economical costs. It involves hiring independent contractors for specific tasks and projects. Thanks to technology, it is easier to outsource different jobs to independent contractors...
  • Having a holiday in foreign country has various advantages, while I think that there are some disadvantages
    Having a holiday in foreign country has various advantages, while I think that there are some disadvantages. Generally, some people prefer to travel to different places for taking a rest from work and enjoy themselves with new atmospheres. Travelling abroad has many advantages such as to gain new ex...
  • Write an essay about Erosion of historical buildings as a result of tourism.
    Tourism is currently contributing significantly to the growth of the global economy. However, this results in the damage of many historical buildings and sites which is hardly repaired. Therefore, this essay will give some possible solutions to the problem above. First and foremost, we should limit...
  • The person who you love best
    When you are asked whom you love best, how will you answer? To be honest, I love my grandmothet than anyone in my family. The reason made me to love her is not just she is my father's mother, it is because no one can understand me like her. Her name is Thom. This October, she will be eighty years ol...





Get more results for topic:
  • The whole world has now become a global village in this modern era in the light of advancement in technology and rapid-moving means of transports and it is not incorrect if we say only one government can lead entire earth in place of individual government in every country. I agree that merits of this have edge over the demerits.