The reading passage and the lecture are discussing about the Turing Test by Alan Turing, which is an experiment about a question " can computers think? " . However the professor is presenting the challenge made by a philosopher, that casts doubt about this test. Further, he discusses stating three main points about the thinking capacity of a computer.
Firstly, according to the professor, the philosopher claims that the Turing Test emphasizes the behavioural aspect rather than the thought processes of a computer. He explains this point with an example, where an english speaking person answers to the question of a chinese person in another room. Here the answers of the english speaking person can be modified to answer adequately if ha has larger refference to access the question. In addition, if the question is detailed and comprehensible, the english speaking person can respond in a correct sequence even though he does not understand chinese. Hence, it raises question about the validity of the Turing Test.
Second point of the challenge is that, a computer can be programmed to produce adequate behaviour, just as a person can act to be intelligent, though he is not. If a computer is programmed with the input of adequate behaviour output, it definitely can pass the Turing Test.
Yet there is a shallow chance of passing the Test because the last important statement of the challenge in the words of the professor is that, the Test itself is meaningless if the computer is unable to answer about the question of artificial intelligence " can computers think? " .
The reading passage and the lecture are
discussing about the
Turing
Test
by Alan Turing, which is an experiment about a
question
"
; can computers
think
?
"
;
.
However
the professor is presenting the challenge made by a philosopher, that casts doubt about this
test
.
Further
, he discusses stating three main points about the thinking capacity of a computer.
Firstly
, according to the professor, the philosopher claims that the Turing
Test
emphasizes the
behavioural
aspect
rather
than the
thought
processes of a computer. He
explains
this point with an example, where an
english
speaking
person
answers
to the
question
of a
chinese
person
in another room. Here the
answers
of the
english
speaking
person
can
be modified
to
answer
adequately
if ha has larger
refference
to access the
question
.
In addition
, if the
question
is detailed
and comprehensible, the
english
speaking
person
can respond in a correct sequence
even though
he does not understand
chinese
.
Hence
, it raises
question
about the validity of the Turing
Test
.
Second point of the challenge is that, a computer can
be programmed
to produce adequate
behaviour
,
just
as a
person
can act to be intelligent, though he is not. If a computer
is programmed
with the input of adequate
behaviour
output, it definitely can pass the Turing
Test
.
Yet
there is a shallow chance of passing the
Test
because
the last
important
statement of the challenge in the words of the professor is that, the
Test
itself is meaningless if the computer is unable to
answer
about the
question
of artificial intelligence
"
; can computers
think
?
"
;
.