It is true that global harmony and unity is maintained by having a nuclear weapon risk. I totally disagree that the benefits of maintaining world peace and cheaper energy outweigh the drawback of mass destruction.
Firstly, a nuclear explosion can possibly trigger the human extinction. The destructive effect of nuclear attack if the control of this explosive device is on the hands of an arrogant leader can never be under estimated. For example, the nuclear test initiated in Japan few decades ago affected marine creatures widely. The nuclear reactions brought the mass killing of whales and fish as well as the destruction of coral reefs. Thus, there is a clear indication that the power of nuclear weapon only benefited a few.
In addition, the idea that nuclear power is a source of cleaner and cheaper energy does not hold a valid argument. This notion was refuted by many because of the fact that there are more alternative sources of energy that are renewable and sustainable. Good examples are solar energy and wind power. Although the cost of operating the plant was higher because it is still in its experimental stage, in the long run, it is expected to efficiently operate at a minimal cost. This clearly confirms that there is a better option available and relying on the use of nuclear energy is not necessary.
In conclusion, although there are advantages of nuclear energy such as international peace and low-cost source of fuel, the high risk of human eradication and other sources of energy should be taken into consideration. I disagree that nuclear power is more important than human life.
It is true that global harmony and unity
is maintained
by having a nuclear weapon
risk
. I
totally
disagree that the benefits of maintaining world peace and cheaper
energy
outweigh the drawback of mass destruction.
Firstly
, a nuclear explosion can
possibly
trigger the human extinction. The destructive effect of nuclear attack if the control of this explosive device is on the hands of an arrogant leader can never be under estimated.
For example
, the nuclear
test
initiated in Japan few decades ago
affected
marine creatures
widely
. The nuclear reactions brought the mass killing of whales and fish
as well
as the destruction of coral reefs.
Thus
, there is a
clear
indication that the
power
of nuclear weapon
only
benefited a few.
In addition
, the
idea
that nuclear
power
is a
source
of cleaner and cheaper
energy
does not hold a valid argument. This notion
was refuted
by
many
because of the fact that
there are more alternative
sources
of
energy
that are renewable and sustainable.
Good
examples are solar
energy
and wind
power
. Although the cost of operating the plant was higher
because
it is
still
in its experimental stage, in the long run, it is
expected
to
efficiently
operate at a minimal cost. This
clearly
confirms that there is a better option available and relying on the
use
of nuclear
energy
is not necessary.
In conclusion
, although there are advantages of nuclear
energy
such as international peace and low-cost
source
of fuel, the high
risk
of human eradication and other
sources
of
energy
should
be taken
into consideration. I disagree that nuclear
power
is more
important
than human life.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
15Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes