The table depicts changes in the total income and the expenditure on food and clothes by an average family in an unknown UK city, and the 3 pie-charts illustrate differences in the proportion of 5 dissimilar kinds of goods on which each family spent their money in 2010 and 2013.
Overall, it can be seen in the table that the total income witnessed an upward trend, while the opposite can be experienced in the spending on food and clothes in 2010 and 2013. As for the pie-charts, all of the surveyed figures varied remarkably with the exception of that for ‘other food and drinks’ which stayed unchanged over the period of time.
Regarding the table, the figure of ‘total income’ accounted 29, 000 pounds in 2010 and this over doubled that of ‘spending on food and clothes’ at that time. By 2013, the former dropped slightly to 25, 000 pounds, while the latter witnessed a tedious rise to 15, 000 pounds.
As far as the pie-charts are concerned, the figure of ‘meat and fish’ accounted for 25% which was the largest in 2010, and this rate was 3% larger than that of ‘clothes’. In 2013, both of the aforementioned figures collapsed to 15% for ‘meat and fish’ and to 12% for ‘clothes’. Meanwhile, the figure of ‘fruit and vegetables’ made up 20% in 2010 and this proportion was 5% larger than that of ‘Diary products’. After 3 years, the figure of ‘fruit and vegetables’ grew progressively to 35%, while that of ‘Diary products’ saw a modest escalation to 20%. In the meantime, the figure of ‘other food and drinks’ stayed at the same level of 18% over the two years.
The table depicts
changes
in the total income and the expenditure on
food
and
clothes
by an average family in an unknown UK city, and the 3 pie-charts illustrate differences in the proportion of 5 dissimilar kinds of
goods
on which each family spent their money in 2010 and 2013.
Overall
, it can be
seen
in the table that the total income witnessed an upward trend, while the opposite can
be experienced
in the spending on
food
and
clothes
in 2010 and 2013. As for the pie-charts,
all of the
surveyed
figures
varied
remarkably
with the exception of
that for ‘other
food
and drinks’ which stayed unchanged over the period of time.
Regarding the table, the
figure
of ‘total income’ accounted 29, 000 pounds in 2010 and this over doubled that of ‘spending on
food
and
clothes’
at that time. By 2013, the former dropped
slightly
to 25, 000 pounds, while the latter witnessed a tedious rise to 15, 000 pounds.
As far as the pie-charts
are concerned
, the
figure
of ‘meat and fish’ accounted for 25% which was the largest in 2010, and this rate was 3% larger than that of
‘clothes’
. In 2013, both of the aforementioned
figures
collapsed to 15% for ‘meat and fish’ and to 12% for
‘clothes’
. Meanwhile, the
figure
of ‘fruit and vegetables’ made up 20% in 2010 and this proportion was 5% larger than that of ‘Diary products’. After 3 years, the
figure
of ‘fruit and vegetables’ grew
progressively
to 35%, while that of ‘Diary products’
saw
a modest escalation to 20%. In the meantime, the
figure
of ‘other
food
and drinks’ stayed at the same level of 18% over the two years.