Some people prefer to donate native communities or directly support underprivileged people, whereas other people do charity in bigger scales. Basically, each method owns benefits aims for a better society, but the latter method is more outstanding than the former ones.
The local endowment is a good measure that source of support is quantitatively limited immediately impacts the people received help. Canteen, for example, which provides non-charged food just supplies for a certain amount of food and for a certain number of people per day. Citizens directly provide help to their local charitable organizations, but there is always restricted in a number of citizens who are willing to give away. Hence, the amount of local help is not abundant all the time, so that this is a minus point of this practice. Additionally, because of the direct giving, the residents can receive immediately the help without long time to wait that means this mechanism promptly satisfies the needs of the miserable people, while the larger-scale organizations have to contemplate before giving helping decisions. Ultimately, the local charity just provides small-scale and instable solutions.
In contrast, national or international organizations are the optimal measures can solve big affairs: national dilemma and global headache with plentiful contribution that the local endowment cannot afford. UNICEF, for example, appeal people to stand with them in order to conduct its necessary measures. The financial source of these organizations comes from all corners of the world, so it apparently is larger than the budget of local charitable entities. Besides, the national and international organizations concentrate on problems which are necessary to handle, affect the economic development of the world. Thus, supporting for these organizations can solve the global emergency crisis that the local charity cannot carry, brings estate effect to everyone on the world. Subsequently, this approach can work on difficult dilemma at a lower financial pressure.
In conclusion, the local endowment can give local solutions, but its financial giving is fluctuated; the larger scales of organizations not only have sufficient budget, but also resolve the national or international concerns. Apparently, the national or international assistance method is still better than the other, because it can solve the global problems in sustainable financial donation. Nevertheless, people should donate within their ability to improve the society.
Some
people
prefer to donate native communities or
directly
support underprivileged
people
, whereas other
people
do charity in bigger scales.
Basically
, each method
owns
benefits aims for a better society,
but
the latter method is more outstanding than the former ones.
The
local
endowment is a
good
measure that source of support is
quantitatively
limited immediately impacts the
people
received
help
. Canteen,
for example
, which provides non-charged food
just
supplies for a certain amount of food and for a certain number of
people
per day. Citizens
directly
provide
help
to their
local
charitable
organizations
,
but
there is always restricted in a number of citizens who are willing to give away.
Hence
, the amount of
local
help
is not abundant all the time,
so
that this is a minus point of this practice.
Additionally
,
because
of the direct giving, the residents can receive immediately the
help
without long time to wait that means this mechanism
promptly
satisfies the needs of the miserable
people
, while the larger-scale
organizations
have to
contemplate
before
giving helping decisions.
Ultimately
, the
local
charity
just
provides
small
-scale and
instable
solutions.
In contrast
,
national
or
international
organizations
are the optimal measures can solve
big
affairs:
national
dilemma and global headache with plentiful contribution that the
local
endowment cannot afford. UNICEF,
for example
, appeal
people
to stand with them in order to conduct its necessary measures. The
financial
source of these
organizations
comes
from all corners of the world,
so
it
apparently
is larger than the budget of
local
charitable entities.
Besides
, the
national
and
international
organizations
concentrate on problems which are necessary to handle, affect the economic development of the world.
Thus
, supporting for these
organizations
can solve the global emergency crisis that the
local
charity cannot carry, brings estate effect to everyone on the world.
Subsequently
, this approach can work on difficult dilemma at a lower
financial
pressure.
In conclusion
, the
local
endowment can give
local
solutions,
but
its
financial
giving
is fluctuated
; the larger scales of
organizations
not
only
have sufficient budget,
but
also
resolve the
national
or
international
concerns.
Apparently
, the
national
or
international
assistance method is
still
better than the other,
because
it can solve the global problems in sustainable
financial
donation.
Nevertheless
,
people
should donate within their ability to
improve
the society.