The author assumes that since the two studies have shown differing results the resopndents in the first study had misepresented their reading habits. This argument relies on three assumptions, that if not supported by specific evidence can significantly weaken the argument.
The author must provide with specific data that the first study conducted was not flawed. It could be possible that the surveyors from University of Waymarsh, conducted their survey during a literary classics’ fest. Hence, the data which they collected would be skewed towards people who prefer literary classics as their reading material. Thus, eventhough the respondents in the first study didn't want to misrepresent their reading habits, it would seem as if they were trying to misguide the surveyers. Therefore, the author must provide specific evidence that the study was held in an impartial environment where there is no possible skewing of data.
Secondly, the author must come up with proof that the preferences of people is same for what books they check out of the public libraries. It might be possible that the readers usually prefer to read literary classics when they are at the library with other people, and they prefer to check out the mystery novels to read at their home, or during their leisure time. Therefore, the author must present with evidence that there is no preference among the people, and they read similar books while in the library and while checking out the books.
Finally, the author must give evidence that the period between both studies is not very long. It can be possible that when the first study was taking place, literary classic was the most popular genre and majority of the people would read them. But, since the second study took place 15 years after the first study there was a big change in the reading habits and now people love reading mystery novels, thus it can be possible that due to a change in common interests of the people the reading habits have been changed. Hence, the author must provide evidence regarding the duration between both studies to strengthen his argument.
Hence, the author must provide the above given evidence to buttress his assertion that respondents in the first study had misrepresented their reading habits. If the author fails to provide the above stated pieces of evidence, then his assertion would be seriously flawed.
The
author
assumes that since the two
studies
have shown differing results the
resopndents
in the
first
study
had
misepresented
their
reading
habits
. This argument relies on three assumptions, that if not supported by specific
evidence
can
significantly
weaken the argument.
The
author
must
provide
with specific data that the
first
study
conducted was not flawed. It could be
possible
that the surveyors from University of
Waymarsh
, conducted their survey during a
literary
classics’ fest.
Hence
, the data which they collected would
be skewed
towards
people
who prefer
literary
classics as their
reading
material.
Thus
,
eventhough
the respondents in the
first
study
didn't want to misrepresent their
reading
habits
, it would seem as if they were trying to misguide the
surveyers
.
Therefore
, the
author
must
provide
specific
evidence
that the
study
was held
in an impartial environment where there is no
possible
skewing of data.
Secondly
, the
author
must
come
up with proof that the preferences of
people
is same for what books they
check
out of the public libraries. It might be
possible
that the readers
usually
prefer to
read
literary
classics when they are at the library with other
people
, and they prefer to
check
out the mystery novels to
read
at their home, or during their leisure time.
Therefore
, the
author
must
present with
evidence
that there is no preference among the
people
, and they
read
similar books while in the library and while checking out the books.
Finally
, the
author
must
give
evidence
that the period between both
studies
is not
very
long. It can be
possible
that when the
first
study
was taking place,
literary
classic
was the most popular genre and
majority of
the
people
would
read
them.
But
, since the second
study
took place 15 years after the
first
study
there was a
big
change
in the
reading
habits
and
now
people
love
reading
mystery novels,
thus
it can be
possible
that due to a
change
in common interests of the
people
the
reading
habits
have been
changed
.
Hence
, the
author
must
provide
evidence
regarding the duration between both
studies
to strengthen his argument.
Hence
, the
author
must
provide
the above
given
evidence
to buttress his assertion that respondents in the
first
study
had misrepresented their
reading
habits
. If the
author
fails to
provide
the above stated pieces of
evidence
, then his assertion would be
seriously
flawed.