Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

the significant of studying philosophical anthropology

the significant of studying philosophical anthropology g5qY1
Philosophical Anthropology is the study of the human being from a philosophical point of view. It is a branch of philosophy which is responsible for the study of humanity as a project of being. It constitutes the question of the humanity: the being of the human, it is not the question alone that makes for the distinctiveness of philosophical anthropology, but rather the primacy that is given to that question[I2]. In this respect, philosophical anthropology appears, not just as one branch of philosophy among others, but as actually bringing with it a distinctive conception of philosophy as fundamentally concerned with the human in a way that comes before anything else. (Benjamin and Malpas 2017: 317) Philosophical anthropology demonstrates the complexities of human beings and his[I3] behaviours that are extremely difficult to comprehend in an entirely accurate way. Besides, according to Edgar Bodenheim[I4], philosophical is a disciple that has a more objective conception than one of anthropology. It studies topics concerning the problems of man[I5], going beyond the questions of his first stage of life on the planet. Philosophical anthropology is the most fundamental inductive of sciences that focuses on human beings and their behaviour. Also, philosophical anthropology watches human being like a human[I6] camera and listens like a tape recorder to constitute the core elements of human behaviour. (Pertti and Pelto 1978: 53[I7] ). Philosophical anthropology perceives man as a self-contradictory and mysterious, capable of surpassing his natural limits in quest of reality. It studies man existence, his experience and his anxieties. Every human individual is a micro-universe of meaning and significance[I8]. The significance of Philosophical anthropology It aims at a new understanding of man’s essential qualities and potentialities. It aims to accomplish this by the development of suitable methods, by a factual illumination of the puzzle in human institutions, and by doubtful research from different branches of sciences. It is an attempt to construct a scientific discipline out of man’s traditional effort to understand and release him. It uses experience and opinion to understand its surroundings and to develop in the [I9] world. [I10] Philosophical anthropology looks at the most fundamental questions about human nature and human conditions. Taking as its point of understanding the recent scientific understanding of human nature, from anthropology broadly conceived, it goes on to question the effects of these views for constant philosophical questions about human rationality, morality, the possibility of progress, the existence of God and the meaning of life. Philosophical anthropology is significant because it assists us to understand ourselves better. It also helps us to understand others better, because through the studies we hope to understand ourselves much better. It is in human nature to desire knowledge and understanding. Besides, there is no way to know the man and his behaviour than to understand his life. It provides us with the information of where do we[I11] originates from. Equally so, it helps us to meditate on our nature as human beings and what is our purpose or rather our relationship with the universe. Indisputably, it highlights human reality it makes it more practical and meaningful by posing questions that most people take them for granted. It responds to the needs of man directly by reflecting on the implications of everyday experience and examining our moral convictions. (Rickman H 1985. P31). Consequently, it reveals to us the sector of human life which is accessible to our individual experience. It also tries to cover human phenomena. It gives and embraces the complete picture of human life by seeking an understanding of man’s life tendencies. Besides, it studies man’s natural limitations and deals with man’s potentialities, with what he as a free agent makes of himself or is able and ought to make of himself. Thus philosophical anthropology studies both man as a creature and man as the creator of cultural values and man as seen by a scientific observer and man as interpreted by him. (Aussen and Innenasicht[I12] ) Philosophical anthropology interprets philosophically the facts that the sciences have discovered concerning the nature of man and the human condition. It presupposes a developed body of scientific thought. It clarifies the basic qualities that make man what he is and distinguishes him from other beings. This discipline aims at providing a critical intervention with the concept of human values and its underlying ideological roots towards various conceptions of human nature. It aims to take various thematic views on the philosophical perspectives on human nature concerning the formation of human values through ancient and modern traditions. Moreover, it helps each one of us to become productive members of society by being good people. It instils in us the concept of a good life and good behaviour around others. It helps us to understand who we are and what our role in the universe is. It gives a meaning of what it means to be a person unlike other social sciences that explains what it is to be a human person but does not explain what it means to be a human person. Philosophical anthropology reflects upon man to understand him in his wholeness, grasping the fundamental principles of his existence in the world and his behaviour. Hence, that, whereas science investigates how the human individual manifests himself toward his environment and his fellow man, Philosophical anthropology asks itself of human being, about the ultimate principles of their existence and activity. (Palumbieri, S 1999: 51-52). It illumines us to see human beings with different perspective to respect the life that is within ourselves and in other beings. We need to understand our world and the things that we do within it for our cognitive growth but also our mental health. If we cannot understand ourselves, how can we understand anything else? So it tries to help us to understand ourselves well[I13]. Philosophical anthropology divides human’s civilization in three sentiments i. e. 1). Anthropocentric- explaining man as a supreme being and the measure of all things, and therefore cannot be any scope wider this. 2). Cosmocentric, it explain man on the plane of nature of the cosmos; man realizes himself only when he behaves according to the laws of nature. 3). Theocentric, here it explains human being on the plane of God, and therefore man behaves correctly and reaches full realization of himself if he conforms to the laws of God and takes God himself as his model. (Batista, M p14[I14] ). It explains our ultimate goal as human persons and the mutual relationship between God and man. It explains the religious aspect of human being, by telling us about the history of man before and after the fall. Also, it gives a different perspective of humanity that of salvation history that is the history of God’s relationship with humanity[I15]. Philosophical anthropology according to Batista[I16] intends to unmask the pretexts of self-sufficiency of scientific knowledge and shows that human reality poses the latter case, its objectives are to advance and complete the knowledge of man’s behaviour, though it is partially developed by the experimental sciences. (Batista M p9). It helps us to fully grasp the longings of human beings, which the human being has been searching without rest since the beginning of their existence. In this aspect, it is emphasized how at present the human being does not consider it necessary to resort in the search of God to be able to solve his problems, but now he seeks to take care of himself. Emmerich Coreth the Austrian philosopher, opened the question of man in terms of philosophical anthropology, by saying that no other known living creatures ask questions about their existence, their essence, or their place and meaning in the world: “the only man asks questions; he questions everything, even himself, his essence- exceeding the immediacy of what is given, heading to the foundations” (Coreth, 1994: 10) it is thus in such case that philosophical anthropology is needed. Now man is seen as being responsible for the world in which he lives. Therefore, man now seeks to solve his problems using scientific and technological advances. At present, it is seen how the human being has found the cure of different diseases that were previously mortal. Here we talk about the “scientific man". [I17] Conclusion. For these reasons, it is said that philosophical anthropology is responsible for the study of man from its essence to the indisputable truths of science[I18]
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Anthropology
is the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
study
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
being from a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
philosophical
point of view. It is a branch of philosophy which is responsible for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
study
of humanity as a project of being. It constitutes the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
question
of the humanity: the being of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
, it is not the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
question
alone that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
makes
for the distinctiveness of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
rather
the primacy
that is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
to that question[I2]. In this respect,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
appears, not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
as one branch of philosophy among others,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
as actually bringing with it a distinctive conception of philosophy as
fundamentally
concerned with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
in a way that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
comes
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
anything else. (Benjamin and
Possible spelling mistake found.
Malpas
2017:
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
317) Philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
demonstrates the complexities of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
beings and his[I3]
Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviours' is British English.
behaviours
that are
extremely
difficult to comprehend in an
entirely
accurate way.
Besides
, according to Edgar
Possible spelling mistake found.
Bodenheim
[I4],
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
philosophical
is a disciple that has a more objective conception than one of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
. It
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
studies
topics concerning the problems of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
man
[I5], going beyond the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
questions
of his
first
stage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
on the planet.

Philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
is the most fundamental inductive of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sciences
that focuses on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
beings and their
Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviour' is British English.
behaviour
.
Also
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
watches
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
being like a human[I6] camera and listens like a tape recorder to constitute the core elements of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviour' is British English.
behaviour
. (
Possible spelling mistake found.
Pertti
and
Possible spelling mistake found.
Pelto
1978: 53[I7]
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
). Philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
perceives
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
as a self-contradictory and mysterious, capable of surpassing his natural limits in quest of reality. It
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
studies
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
existence
, his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experience
and his anxieties. Every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
individual is a micro-universe of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meaning
and significance[I8].

The significance of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Philosophical
anthropology

It
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
aims
at a new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understanding
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man’s
essential qualities and potentialities. It
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
aims
to accomplish this by the development of suitable methods, by a factual illumination of the puzzle in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
institutions, and by doubtful research from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
branches of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sciences
. It is an attempt to construct a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
discipline out of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man’s
traditional effort to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understand
and release him.
Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
It
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
uses
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experience
and opinion to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understand
its surroundings and to develop in the [I9]
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
. [I10]

Philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
looks at the most fundamental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
questions
about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
conditions. Taking as its point of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understanding
the recent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understanding
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
, from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
broadly
conceived, it goes on to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
question
the effects of these views for constant
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
questions
about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
rationality, morality, the possibility of progress, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
existence
of God and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meaning
of life.

Philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
is significant
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it assists us to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understand
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ourselves
better. It
also
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
helps
us to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understand
others better,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
through the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
studies
we hope to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understand
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ourselves
much better. It is in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
to desire knowledge and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understanding
.
Besides
, there is no way to know the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
and his
Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviour' is British English.
behaviour
than to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understand
his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
. It provides us with the information of where do we[I11] originates from.
Equally
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
, it
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
helps
us to meditate on our
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
beings and what is our purpose or
rather
our relationship with the universe.

Indisputably
, it highlights
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
reality it
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
makes
it more practical and meaningful by posing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
questions
that most
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
take them for granted. It responds to the needs of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
directly
by reflecting on the implications of everyday
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experience
and examining our moral convictions. (
Possible spelling mistake found.
Rickman
H 1985. P31).

Consequently
, it reveals to us the sector of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
which is accessible to our individual
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experience
. It
also
tries to cover
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
phenomena. It gives and embraces the complete picture of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
by seeking an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understanding
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man’s
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
tendencies.
Besides
, it
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
studies
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man’s
natural limitations and deals with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man’s
potentialities, with what he as a free agent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
makes
of himself or is able and ought to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
of himself.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Thus
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
studies
both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
as a creature and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
as the creator of cultural values and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
as
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
by a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
observer and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
as interpreted by him. (
Possible spelling mistake found.
Aussen
and
Possible spelling mistake found.
Innenasicht
[I12]
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
) Philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
interprets
philosophically
the facts that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sciences
have discovered concerning the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
condition. It presupposes a developed body of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
. It clarifies the basic qualities that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
what he is and distinguishes him from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
beings. This discipline
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
aims
at providing a critical intervention with the concept of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
values and its underlying ideological roots towards various conceptions of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
. It
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
aims
to take various thematic views on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
philosophical
perspectives on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
concerning the formation of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
values through ancient and modern traditions.

Moreover
, it
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
helps
each one of us to become productive members of society by being
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
. It
Possible spelling mistake. 'instils' is British English.
instils
in us the concept of a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviour' is British English.
behaviour
around others. It
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
helps
us to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understand
who we are and what our role in the universe is.
Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
It
gives a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meaning
of what it means to be a person unlike
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
social
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sciences
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
explains
what it is to be a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
person
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
does not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
explain
what it means to be a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
person.

Philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
reflects upon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understand
him in his wholeness, grasping the fundamental principles of his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
existence
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
and his
Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviour' is British English.
behaviour
.
Hence
, that, whereas
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
science
investigates how the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
individual manifests himself toward his environment and his fellow
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
asks itself of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
being, about the ultimate principles of their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
existence
and activity. (
Possible spelling mistake found.
Palumbieri
, S 1999: 51-52).

It illumines us to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
beings with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
perspective to respect the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
that is
within
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ourselves
and in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
beings. We need to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understand
our
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
and the things that we do within it for our cognitive growth
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
our mental health. If we cannot
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understand
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ourselves
, how can we
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understand
anything else?
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
it tries to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
help
us to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
understand
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ourselves
well[I13].

Philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
divides
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human’s
civilization in three sentiments
There should be no space here: "i.e.".
i. e.
1). Anthropocentric- explaining
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
as a supreme being and the measure of all things, and
therefore
cannot be any scope wider this. 2).
Possible spelling mistake found.
Cosmocentric
, it
Did you mean "explains"?
explain
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
on the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
plane
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
of the cosmos;
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
realizes himself
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
when he behaves according to the laws of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
. 3).
Possible spelling mistake found.
Theocentric
, here it
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
explains
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
being on the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
plane
of God, and
therefore
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
behaves
correctly
and reaches full realization of himself if he conforms to the laws of God and takes God himself as his model. (Batista, M p14[I14]
Don't put a space before the closing parenthesis
)
.

It
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
explains
our ultimate goal as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
persons and the mutual relationship between God and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
. It
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
explains
the religious aspect of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
being, by telling us about the history of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
and after the fall.
Also
, it gives a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
perspective of humanity that of salvation history
that is
the history of God’s relationship with humanity[I15].

Philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
according to Batista[I16] intends to unmask the pretexts of self-sufficiency of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
knowledge and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
reality poses the latter case, its objectives are to advance and complete the knowledge of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man’s
Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviour' is British English.
behaviour
, though it is
partially
developed by the experimental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sciences
. (Batista M p9).

It
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
helps
us to
fully
grasp the longings of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
beings, which the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
being has been searching without rest since the beginning of their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
existence
. In this aspect, it
is emphasized
how at present the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
being does not consider it necessary to resort in the search of God to be able to solve his problems,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
he seeks to take care of himself.

Possible spelling mistake found.
Emmerich
Possible spelling mistake found.
Coreth
the Austrian philosopher, opened the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
question
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
in terms of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
, by saying that no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
known living creatures ask
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
questions
about their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
existence
, their essence, or their place and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meaning
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
: “the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
asks
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
questions
; he
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
questions
everything, even himself, his essence- exceeding the immediacy of what is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
, heading to the foundations” (
Possible spelling mistake found.
Coreth
, 1994: 10) it is
thus
in such case that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
is needed
.

This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Now
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
as being responsible for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
in which he
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
.
Therefore
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
seeks to solve his problems using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
and technological advances. At present, it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
how the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
being has found the cure of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
diseases that were previously mortal. Here we talk about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
“scientific
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
man
Use a smart closing quote here: "”".
"
. [I17]

Conclusion.

For these reasons, it
is said
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
philosophical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
anthropology
is responsible for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
study
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
man
from its essence to the indisputable truths of science[I18]
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay the significant of studying philosophical anthropology

Essay
  American English
19 paragraphs
1392 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts