It is true that a huge amount of money has been spent on building preservation in many cities. To some extent I agree that governments prioritise the development of new housing and infrastructure, but I would also argue that we do need to restore and preserve old buildings that have a cultural identity.
On the one hand, I accept the idea that governments should put a priority on the new development of housing and infrastructure because it certainly improves people’s lives.
First of all, governments have to ensure the provision of adequate housing.
There needs to be affordable and comfortable housing for all different family structure, considering the current situation where we are moving towards the culture of nuclear families and changing lifestyle.
As well as housing provision, it would be one of the biggest jobs for governments to establish a proper public transport system so that people could travel to work or college without stress.
Also, spending more money on developing new public facilities, such as schools, hospitals, police stations, and parks could result in providing more enjoyable and easy life.
However, I would argue that it is essential for a country to spend money on restoring or preserving old buildings because they deeply related to cultural identity which should be maintained.
One good example would be Japan’s ancient city, Kyoto.
They have preserved its historical buildings for centuries.
Its governments have been spending a great deal of time, money and effort on setting up building regulations or implementing campaigns aimed at raising awareness of the importance of historical building preservation.
As a result, the city landscape is very well preserved, and it attracts around 3. 6 million foreign visitors every year, because of its unique historical identity.
Without such an effort, their cultural identity would have disappeared along with its unique cultural landscape.
In conclusion, while I understand that new developments bring an overall improvement in people’s quality of life, I believe that it is important to restore old buildings in terms of preservation of cultural identity.
It is true that a huge amount of
money
has
been spent
on
building
preservation in
many
cities. To
some
extent I
agree
that
governments
prioritise
the development of
new
housing and infrastructure,
but
I would
also
argue that we do need to restore and preserve
old
buildings
that have a
cultural
identity.
On the one hand, I accept the
idea
that
governments
should put a priority on the
new
development of housing and infrastructure
because
it
certainly
improves
people
’s
lives
.
First of all
,
governments
have to
ensure the provision of adequate housing.
There needs to be affordable and comfortable housing for all
different
family structure, considering the
current
situation where we are moving towards the culture of nuclear families and changing lifestyle.
As well
as housing provision, it would be one of the biggest jobs for
governments
to establish a proper public transport system
so
that
people
could travel to work or college without
stress
.
Also
, spending more
money
on developing
new
public facilities, such as schools, hospitals, police stations, and parks could result in providing more enjoyable and easy life.
However
, I would argue that it is essential for a country to spend
money
on restoring or preserving
old
buildings
because
they
deeply
related to
cultural
identity which should
be maintained
.
One
good
example would be Japan’s ancient city, Kyoto.
They have preserved its historical
buildings
for centuries.
Its
governments
have been spending a great deal of time,
money
and effort on setting up
building
regulations or implementing campaigns aimed at raising awareness of the importance of historical
building
preservation.
As a result
, the city landscape is
very
well preserved
, and it attracts around 3. 6 million foreign visitors every year,
because
of its unique historical identity.
Without such an effort, their
cultural
identity would have disappeared along with its unique
cultural
landscape.
In conclusion
, while I understand that
new
developments bring an
overall
improvement in
people
’s quality of life, I believe that it is
important
to restore
old
buildings
in terms of preservation of
cultural
identity.