The reading discussed the reasons to believe that a small mammal, 25 could not have been an active hunter but the lecturer presents reasons each why the three reasons are unconvincing.

at was recently found. In the reading passage, researches have demonstrated that the mammal was actually a scavenger. On the contrary, the woman in the listening affirm that recent researches has shown that the mammal was actually a hunter of small dinosaurs. In the reading the author states that the small dinosaurs they found in the stomach of the R. Robustus was probably inside an egg because normally their height was up to 2 meters. This dinosaur was too big to be the pray of R. Robustus. The Professor in the listening disagree, because probably R. robustus was a hunter of baby dinosaurs. The Author explain his statement by focusing the attention to the legs of the mammal, short and underneath. Not useful to actually chaise a victim. At the same time the Professor in the listening demonstrate that nowadays exist a mammal with the same characteristic that it is a predator: the Tasmania Devil. Finally, the last characteristics that support the thesis of the author is that in the bons of the praise founded in the stomach of the R. Robustus there are no signs of teeth as it used to be if the dinosaurs was being hunted. The professor in the listening doubt it because other researches have shown that that type of mammal was not using the back teeth to eat the prey.