Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The provide linear representation reveals the information about the national recycling rates from 1960 to 2011.

The provide linear representation reveals the information about the national recycling rates from 1960 to 2011. 3MXjN
In an overview, which total waste recovery was steadily increase but after sometime show the peak point while bt he percent of recycling show the increasing trend in the initial year but after some year sharply increase and reach near to peak point. Looking at the details, In 1960, which waste recovery was 5. 6 million tons. In one decade, It was increase slightly with 9. 3 but after that next one decade which was waste recovery it reach 16. 7 million tons. In 1985, the total waste recovery was increase quickly and end of the year reach to the peak point. It was 66. 9. In 1960, the precent of recycling high as compare to total waste recovery with 6. 4%. Next one decade, the percent recycling increase slowly. It was 7. 3%. In 1975 to 1985 increase gradually with 10. 11%. In 1985, percent recycling touch the peak point of the end of year.
In an overview, which total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recovery
was
steadily
Consider using a past participle here: "increased".
increase
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
after sometime
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
peak
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
point
while
Possible spelling mistake found.
bt
he percent of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
the increasing trend in the initial
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
after
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
sharply
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
and reach near to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
peak
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
point
. Looking at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
, In 1960, which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recovery
was 5. 6 million tons. In one decade, It was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
slightly
with 9. 3
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
after that
next
one decade which was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recovery
it
Did you mean "reaches"?
reach
16. 7 million tons. In 1985, the total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recovery
was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
quickly
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
reach to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
peak
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
point
. It was 66. 9. In 1960, the
Possible spelling mistake found.
precent
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
high as compare to total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recovery
with 6. 4%.
Next
one decade, the percent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
slowly
. It was 7. 3%. In 1975 to 1985
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
gradually
with 10. 11%. In 1985, percent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
touch the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
peak
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
point
of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The provide linear representation reveals the information about the national recycling rates from 1960 to 2011.

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
156 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts