Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The professor revises the idea presented in the passage that the power companies oppose the stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash and refutes each of the arguments made in the passage.

The professor revises the idea presented in the passage that the power companies oppose the stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash and refutes each of the arguments made in the passage. 15mkN
The professor revises the idea presented in the passage that the power companies oppose the stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash and refutes each of the arguments made in the passage. First of all, the reading states that there are already some regulations like using liner-special materials. The professor explains that the existed regulations are not sufficient. She argues that the liner regulation is only obligatory for new landfills and ponds. Thus, stricter rules should be created for all sites, old and new. Secondly, according to the reading, stricter regulations would result in the lower tendency of customers for exploiting the recycled coal ash products. The professor rejects this idea by giving an example of mercury. This material has been under very strict rules for a long time due to its possible dangers, but it has been successfully recycled, and this process has not changed the customer's minds towards the products. Finally, the professor confirms that the stricter rules would increase the costs for the power companies. However, she believes that the merits of this approach weigh out its drawbacks. In fact, the increased electricity costs have a small effect of up to 1 percent, but its huge environmental advantages are far more important.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
revises the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
presented in the passage that the power
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
oppose the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stricter
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulations
for handling and storing coal ash and refutes each of the arguments made in the passage.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, the reading states that there are already
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulations
like using liner-special materials. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explains
that the existed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulations
are not sufficient. She argues that the liner
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulation
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
obligatory for new landfills and ponds.
Thus
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stricter
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
should
be created
for all sites,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
old
and new.

Secondly
, according to the reading,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stricter
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulations
would result in the lower tendency of customers for exploiting the recycled coal ash products. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
rejects this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
by giving an example of mercury. This material has been under
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
strict
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
for a long time due to its possible
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
dangers
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
it has been
successfully
recycled, and this process has not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changed
the customer's minds towards the products.

Finally
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
confirms that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stricter
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
would increase the costs for the power
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
.
However
, she believes that the merits of this approach weigh out its drawbacks. In fact, the increased electricity costs have a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
effect of up to 1 percent,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
its huge environmental advantages are far more
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The professor revises the idea presented in the passage that the power companies oppose the stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash and refutes each of the arguments made in the passage.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
206 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The professor revises the idea presented in the passage that the power companies oppose the stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash and refutes each of the arguments made in the passage.