The reading claims that wearing uniform is an excellent way of reducing stress and difficulties among students. The professor concedes that the author's points about reducing difficulties can be true, but except of this point, nothing much was correctly discussed in the article. So, she refutes each of author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that families and students would benefit from this policy because it would decrease the clothing cost. The lecturer opposes this point by stating that students' parents would still spend the extra money on fashionable clothes. She explains that uniforms are not provided for free. And, parents have to pay more for them. Also, because uniforms are sold in specialty stores with higher prices, so they have to pay even more. She adds that uniforms are not the only clothes that students wear, meaning they still need fashionable clothes for the weekends, when they hang out with other students or friends.
Second, the article asserts that wearing uniform will eliminate the unnecessary distraction. The lecturer contends that wearing same clothes will not eliminate the distraction. She explains that students use fashinable clothes to emphasize attractive things and untrendy clothes to deemphasize the unattractive things. So, by replacing regular clothing with uniforms, they will focus on other things. For instance, they will focus on how themselves or other students look. Plus, they will alter the uniforms to make them look in a way that they want.
Third, the reading avers that uniforms will help students to develop a sense of community. The professor refutes this point by mentioning that this point is the least responsible reason. She says that there is no way to build a community by just wearing same clothing. She states that students communicate their individuality by wearing different clothes. Forcing students to wear uniforms is going to suffocate their independency and the sense of being themselves. So, it should be avoided.
The reading claims that wearing
uniform
is an excellent way of reducing
stress
and difficulties among
students
. The professor concedes that the author's
points
about reducing difficulties can be true,
but
except of this
point
, nothing much was
correctly
discussed in the article.
So
, she refutes each of author's reasons.
First
, the reading posits that families and
students
would benefit from this policy
because
it would decrease the clothing cost. The lecturer opposes this
point
by stating that students' parents would
still
spend the extra money on fashionable
clothes
. She
explains
that
uniforms
are not provided for free. And, parents
have to
pay more for them.
Also
,
because
uniforms
are sold
in specialty stores with higher prices,
so
they
have to
pay even more. She
adds
that
uniforms
are not the
only
clothes
that
students
wear, meaning they
still
need fashionable
clothes
for the weekends, when they hang out with other
students
or friends.
Second, the article asserts that wearing
uniform
will eliminate the unnecessary distraction. The lecturer contends that wearing same
clothes
will not eliminate the distraction. She
explains
that
students
use
fashinable
clothes
to emphasize attractive things and
untrendy
clothes
to
deemphasize
the unattractive things.
So
, by replacing regular clothing with
uniforms
, they will focus on other things.
For instance
, they will focus on how themselves or other
students
look. Plus, they will alter the
uniforms
to
make
them look in a way that they want.
Third, the reading avers that
uniforms
will
help
students
to develop a sense of community. The professor refutes this
point
by mentioning that this
point
is the least responsible reason. She says that there is no way to build a community by
just
wearing same clothing. She states that
students
communicate their individuality by wearing
different
clothes
. Forcing
students
to wear
uniforms
is going to suffocate their
independency
and the sense of being themselves.
So
, it should
be avoided
.