Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The professor discusses the decline in the population of birds in the United States and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations.

The professor discusses the decline in the population of birds in the United States and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations. MM35o
The professor discusses the decline in the population of birds in the United States and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations. The information she presents contradicts the facts outlined in the reading passage. First, the professor asserts that the claim about destruction of bird's natural habitats is unconvincing. She states that human settlements, however, provided better and larger habitats for some species of birds. For example, the population of Hawks, Pigeons, and Rodents in some cities has increases. Although the population of some types of birds has declined, the population of other types increased significantly. However, the reading passage says that the size of the bird population depends on those vanishing habitats. Second, the speaker makes the point that wilderness areas had not been converted to agricultural use in the way the passage assumes. Actually, less land was used for agricultural use in the US due to new agricultural technologies. Moreover, due to introduction of high productive and new crops, more food is available for people in the US. With the advent of new technologies and sciences, there is no need to destroy the wilderness areas. On the other hand, the article specifies that the growth of agriculture will lead to more destruction of birds’ habitats. Third, the speaker speaks about two methods that were used in US to control the negative effects of traditional pesticides. Firstly, the scientists have developed less toxic pesticides. Secondly, the crops become more pesticide resistance. Therefore, there is less need for chemical resistance corps and the birds will not be hurt at all. Quite the opposite, the reading passage indicates that pesticides have significantly contributed to declines in bird population.
The professor discusses the decline in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birds
in the United States and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
and explanations. The information she presents contradicts the facts outlined in the reading passage.

First
, the professor asserts that the claim about destruction of bird's natural habitats is unconvincing. She states that human settlements,
however
, provided better and larger habitats for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
species of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birds
.
For example
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
of Hawks, Pigeons, and Rodents in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
cities has increases. Although the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birds
has declined, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
of other types increased
significantly
.
However
, the reading passage says that the size of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bird
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
depends on those vanishing habitats.

Second, the speaker
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
the point that wilderness areas had not
been converted
to agricultural
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
in the way the passage assumes. Actually, less land was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for agricultural
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
in the US due to new agricultural technologies.
Moreover
, due to introduction of high productive and new crops, more food is available for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
in the US. With the advent of new technologies and sciences, there is no need to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroy
the wilderness areas.
On the other hand
, the article specifies that the growth of agriculture will lead to more destruction of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birds’
habitats.

Third, the speaker speaks about two methods that were
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
in US to control the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
effects of traditional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pesticides
.
Firstly
, the scientists have developed less toxic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pesticides
.
Secondly
, the crops become more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pesticide
resistance.
Therefore
, there is less need for chemical resistance corps and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
birds
will not
be hurt
at all. Quite the opposite, the reading passage indicates that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pesticides
have
significantly
contributed to declines in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bird
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The professor discusses the decline in the population of birds in the United States and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
282 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The professor discusses the decline in the population of birds in the United States and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations.