Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The professor discusses the advantages of communal online encyclopedias and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations.

The professor discusses the advantages of communal online encyclopedias and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations. yXLmE
The professor discusses the advantages of communal online encyclopedias and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations. The information she presents contradicts the facts outlined in the reading passage. First, she states that an encyclopedia without any error is impossible to find. We can never make sure that an encyclopedia is 100% free of error, no matter it is online or not. Moreover, in online encyclopedias, correcting mistakes is easier in comparison to traditional printed ones. Hence, the errors in printed versions may remain intact for decades. Although, the reading passage says online encyclopedias often lack credentials. Second, the professor asserts that online encyclopedias are safe, due to strong protection strategies, which are implemented nowadays. For example, the articles online could be submitted on a read-only format, so that no one can change or edit them. What's more, skilled editors and experts in related areas could be hired to check and review the information or data and make changes whenever necessary. On the other hand, the article casts doubt on the safety of online encyclopedias, by speaking about the possibilities of hacking and fabrication of information. Third, the professor is against the point that communal online encyclopedias have a narrow focus. In contrast, it is their core advantage. As everyone knows, a great variety of journals, e-books, and other sources of information are available online, which offer a vast diversity of viewpoints and topics to interested readers. However, because of their limited space, traditional printed encyclopedias present limited information covering a small portion of the topic. On the contrary, the reading passage posits that online encyclopedias create a false impression of what is important or popular and what is not.
The professor discusses the advantages of communal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
encyclopedias and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
and explanations. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
information
she presents contradicts the facts outlined in the reading passage.

First
, she states that an encyclopedia without any error is impossible to find. We can never
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
sure that an encyclopedia is 100% free of error, no matter it is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
or not.
Moreover
, in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
encyclopedias, correcting mistakes is easier
in comparison
to traditional printed ones.
Hence
, the errors in printed versions may remain intact for decades.
“Although” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Although
, the reading passage says
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
encyclopedias
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
lack credentials.

Second, the professor asserts that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
encyclopedias are safe, due to strong protection strategies, which
are implemented
nowadays.
For example
, the articles
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
could
be submitted
on a read-
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
format,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that no one can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
or edit them. What's more, skilled editors and experts in related areas could
be hired
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
check
and review the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
information
or data and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
whenever necessary.
On the other hand
, the article casts doubt on the safety of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
encyclopedias, by speaking about the possibilities of hacking and fabrication of information.

Third, the professor is against the point that communal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
encyclopedias have a narrow focus.
In contrast
, it is their core advantage. As everyone knows, a great variety of journals, e-books, and other sources of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
information
are available
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
, which offer a vast diversity of viewpoints and topics to interested readers.
However
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of their limited space, traditional printed encyclopedias present limited
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
information
covering a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
portion of the topic.
On the contrary
, the reading passage posits that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
encyclopedias create a false impression of what is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
or popular and what is not.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The professor discusses the advantages of communal online encyclopedias and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
285 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The professor discusses the advantages of communal online encyclopedias and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations.