Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The professor discusses the points made in the article and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations.

The professor discusses the points made in the article and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations. 85GPB
The professor discusses the points made in the article and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations. The information he presents contradicts the facts outlined in the reading passage. First, the professor is against the point that the buildings were residential. According to the professor, only the outside of the buildings looks like Latin American houses; however, if we take a meticulous look inside the houses, one doubt that the buildings could be used for living. As the professor said, there are a few fire places in the house, and we know that if one hundred people supposed to live in these buildings, there must be more fire places. Moreover, low number of rooms in the buildings also proves that these buildings were not residential. On the other hand, the reading passage concludes that the buildings were purely residential. Second, the professor argues that the fact that these buildings were used as maize storage is not convincing. In accordance to the professor, there is no evidence in support of this assertion, as the excavation results show. Why no one has found any maize on the floor of these buildings or any storage vessel in there? The professor rejects the article's point and concludes that these houses were not used for storage. Quite the opposite, the reading passage states that the size of the great houses would make them very suitable for storage. Third, the professor posits that identification of broken pots can not prove that these great houses were used for ceremonies. Many other materials such as construction materials were also found there, which indicates that these houses might be utilized to store construction tools or maybe construction workers used to live here and these tools and pots belong to them. Hence, the article fails to consider these possibilities and its argument is not acceptable as it stands.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
discusses the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
points
made in the article and refutes each of the author's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
points
by providing supporting
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
and explanations. The information he presents contradicts the facts outlined in the reading passage.

First
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
is against the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
point
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
were residential. According to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
the outside of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
looks like Latin American
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
houses
;
however
, if we take a meticulous look inside the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
houses
, one doubt that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
could be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for living. As the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
said, there are a few fire places in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
house
, and we know that if one hundred
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
supposed to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
in these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
, there
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be more fire places.
Moreover
, low number of rooms in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
also
proves that these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
were not residential.
On the other hand
, the reading passage concludes that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
were
purely
residential.

Second, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
argues that the fact that these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
were
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as maize storage is not convincing. In accordance to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
, there is no evidence in support of this assertion, as the excavation results
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
. Why no one has found any maize on the floor of these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
or any storage vessel in there? The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
rejects the article's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
point
and concludes that these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
houses
were not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for storage. Quite the opposite, the reading passage states that the size of the great
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
houses
would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
them
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
suitable for storage.

Third, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
posits that identification of broken pots can not prove that these great
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
houses
were
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for ceremonies.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
other materials such as construction materials were
also
found there, which indicates that these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
houses
might
be utilized
to store construction tools or maybe construction workers
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
here and these tools and pots belong to them.
Hence
, the article fails to consider these possibilities and its argument is not acceptable as it stands.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The professor discusses the points made in the article and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
313 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The professor discusses the points made in the article and refutes each of the author's points by providing supporting details and explanations.