Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.3

Nowadays, our life has changed from our ancestors' style, and in this modern life, we need some kind of supports, especially in mobile aspects. It is because people become more mobile and active rather than in previous decades. It might be reason of the amounts of traffic accidents in cities, while reducing this kind of regulation may reject people to commute or travel by car. However, I believe that there are more alternatives to prevent from traffic congestions which will be discussed here. To begin with, transport is an essential part of urban life and lengthy journeys and also help to move easily. Nonetheless, these factors leads too much traffic with the case of outdated road infrastructure. This means that too many vehicles use the existing network and traffic is inevitable. We see this in most large cities globally, ( for instance): London or Tokyo, many conurbations also lack finance for transport hubs, including integrated road and rail facilities which could connect public and private vehicles, thus reducing bottlenecks. Furthermore, for the cause of it, some people assume that only remedy for it to reduce the need for people to travel from home to work, education or shopping. This contributes so more problems with an already stretched system. Regarding potential options, probably robusting alternatives in the way of encouraging investment in better infrastructure to fix roadway constructions as well as increase road space for private and public vehicles. These range from enriching public transport to empower communal car-pooling than private cars which cause congestions. Another way of taking remedy for it, might be to use tax imcentives to allow more home-working, so that there is less need to commute for work. To conclude, it seems that outdated infrastructure and need for space to roads are the key factors behind cities' transport frustrations. Conversely, rather than reduce people's effort to travel by car, it would rather better to encourage people to use rail networks and public transport.
Nowadays, our life has
changed
from our ancestors' style, and in this modern life, we
need
some
kind of supports,
especially
in mobile aspects. It is
because
people
become more mobile and active
rather
than in previous decades. It might be reason of the amounts of
traffic
accidents in cities, while reducing this kind of regulation may reject
people
to commute or travel by car.
However
, I believe that there are more alternatives to
prevent
from
traffic
congestions which will
be discussed
here.

To
begin
with,
transport
is an essential part of urban life and lengthy journeys and
also
help
to
move
easily
. Nonetheless, these factors leads too much
traffic
with the case of outdated
road
infrastructure. This means that too
many
vehicles
use
the existing network and
traffic
is inevitable. We
see
this in most large cities globally,
(
for instance
): London or Tokyo,
many
conurbations
also
lack finance for
transport
hubs, including integrated
road
and rail facilities which could connect
public
and private vehicles,
thus
reducing bottlenecks.
Furthermore
, for the cause of it,
some
people
assume that
only
remedy for it to
reduce
the
need
for
people
to travel from home to work, education or shopping. This contributes
so
more problems with an already stretched system.

Regarding potential options,
probably
robusting
alternatives in the way of encouraging investment in better infrastructure to
fix
roadway constructions
as well
as increase
road
space for private and
public
vehicles. These range from enriching
public
transport
to empower communal car-pooling than private cars which cause congestions. Another way of taking remedy for it, might be to
use
tax
imcentives
to
allow
more home-working,
so
that there is less
need
to commute for work.

To conclude
, it seems that outdated infrastructure and
need
for space to
roads
are the key factors behind cities'
transport
frustrations.
Conversely
,
rather
than
reduce
people
's effort to travel by car, it would
rather
better to encourage
people
to
use
rail networks and
public
transport
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad
Show Comments
A man who knows two languages is worth two men.
French Proverb

IELTS essay The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
326 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts