The highways are becoming more dangerous. Hence, it is commonly considered that enforcing a harsher punishment for individuals that break traffic rules is the sole means of making our highways safer. In my opinion, I completely support this notion because doing this would distract and get these miscreants off the roads.
To begin, discouraging of traffic offenders is my first reason to be considered on why this statement is supported. To put simply, the greater the repercussion for an action, the more people avoid doing that act. For example, research has shown that the fear of capital punishment has discouraged prospective murderers. Similarly, if road punishments are harsher, then traffic rules would be less broken. Evidently, it can be seen that reprimanding more people for committing lesser road offences has a discouraging effect.
Not only this but, having a harsher penalty can get these rule breakers off the highway thereby make road transport safer. To elaborate, creating a rule where a driver's license or a vehicle would be seized for break minute traffic laws would ensure that road law breakers would no longer be on our roads. For instance, criminals are being jailed for their crimes. Thus, more and more criminals are removed from the society each day. So if this penalty is implemented for driving, then they would be a thing of the past. As a result, our roads become safer. In all, it is apparent that stricter penalties can remove criminals from our roads.
To conclude, the effects of increasing the severity of punishments for traffic law breakers cannot be overemphasized. As such, by discouraging would be offenders and kicking out current ones, our roads are made less dangerous. Unless stronger penalties are enforced, our roads would remain unsafe
The highways are becoming more
dangerous
.
Hence
, it is
commonly
considered that enforcing a harsher
punishment
for individuals that break
traffic
rules
is the sole means of making our highways safer. In my opinion, I completely support this notion
because
doing this would distract and
get
these miscreants off the roads.
To
begin
, discouraging of
traffic
offenders is my
first
reason to
be considered
on why this statement
is supported
. To put
simply
, the greater the repercussion for an action, the more
people
avoid doing that act.
For example
, research has shown that the fear of capital
punishment
has discouraged prospective murderers.
Similarly
, if
road
punishments
are harsher, then
traffic
rules
would be less broken.
Evidently
, it can be
seen
that reprimanding more
people
for committing lesser
road
offences
has a discouraging effect.
Not
only
this
but
, having a harsher
penalty
can
get
these
rule
breakers off the highway thereby
make
road
transport safer. To elaborate, creating a
rule
where a driver's license or a vehicle would
be seized
for break minute
traffic
laws would ensure that
road
law breakers would no longer be on our
roads
.
For instance
, criminals are
being jailed
for their crimes.
Thus
, more and more criminals
are removed
from the society each day.
So
if this
penalty
is implemented
for driving, then they would be a thing of the past.
As a result
, our
roads
become safer. In all, it is apparent that stricter
penalties
can remove criminals from our roads.
To conclude
, the effects of increasing the severity of
punishments
for
traffic
law breakers cannot
be overemphasized
. As such, by discouraging would be offenders and kicking out
current
ones, our
roads
are made
less
dangerous
. Unless stronger
penalties
are enforced
, our
roads
would remain
unsafe