The topic of legalising guns is one of the most contentious social and political issues recently. Some believe it is essential in safeguarding society, while others find it dangerous to the community. So, it is best to draw the conclusion by weighing out the statistics surrounding gun ownership vs. gun violence.
To begin, most youngsters nowadays are associated with crimes like murders, suicides, and robbery because of having easy access to weapons like firearms. Considering these young people lacks maturity, they exaggerate certain kinds of risk to minimize others.
Even minor disagreemnet or physical altercations turns into a violent crime with common people being armed with weapons. Likewise, having guns at home can be dangerous for a family, especially with young children or teens. It is because the majority of gun owners are very inconsiderate of securing the weapon, thus kids can cause major accidents playing with firearms. All these compelling reasons suggest these weapons tend to trigger violence in society.
On the other hand, having access to firearms can boost the safety of an individual by allowing the law-abiding citizens to protect themselves. Such weapons can help secure people's homes and families from any sort of unanticipated dangers; whether it be from wild animals or burglar attacks. Moreover, guns can strengthen the defense sector of a country. Having abundance of guns can enhance a nation's ability to prevent enemy attacks. Last but not least, these firearms can play a vital role to provide extra security to the VIP's or high ranked individuals.
To conclude, I believe guns should only be handed to those responsible in safeguarding society. Therefore, I disagree with the statement that more guns make a country safer.
The topic of
legalising
guns
is one of the most contentious social and political issues recently.
Some
believe it is essential in safeguarding society, while others find it
dangerous
to the community.
So
, it is best to draw the conclusion by weighing out the statistics surrounding
gun
ownership vs.
gun
violence.
To
begin
, most youngsters nowadays
are associated
with crimes like murders, suicides, and robbery
because
of
having
easy access to
weapons
like
firearms
. Considering these young
people
lacks
maturity, they exaggerate certain kinds of
risk
to minimize others.
Even minor
disagreemnet
or physical altercations turns into a violent crime with common
people
being armed
with
weapons
.
Likewise
,
having
guns
at home can be
dangerous
for a family,
especially
with young children or teens. It is
because
the majority of
gun
owners are
very
inconsiderate of securing the
weapon
,
thus
kids can cause major accidents playing with
firearms
. All these compelling reasons suggest these
weapons
tend to trigger violence in society.
On the other hand
,
having
access to
firearms
can boost the safety of an individual by allowing the law-abiding citizens to protect themselves. Such
weapons
can
help
secure
people
's homes and families from any sort of unanticipated
dangers
; whether it be from wild animals or burglar attacks.
Moreover
,
guns
can strengthen the defense sector of a country.
Having
abundance of
guns
can enhance a nation's ability to
prevent
enemy attacks. Last
but
not least, these
firearms
can play a vital role to provide extra security to the VIP's or high ranked individuals.
To conclude
, I believe
guns
should
only
be handed
to those responsible in safeguarding society.
Therefore
, I disagree with the statement that more
guns
make
a country safer.