It is true that the museum is a nonprofit activity that is engineered to provoke the educational environment. Therefore, the proposal of the complimentary cost of entry fees for students is very precise. However, I reckon that the museum should charge and this essay will address some reasons for both sides.
On the one hand, plenty of advocates of students not paying for museums could cite various compelling reasons, one of which is that most museums have raised the colossal amount of money in governmental sponsorship which is extracted from residents' taxes. Therefore, if people were charged with the museums, they would consider that their budget which are obligated to be collected by political organization monthly are overused in the other purposes but not to enhance the museums. Another possible reason is poverty-stricken children being exposed to the adept knowledge of museums. In other words, in some developing countries, some families are so poor that they diametrically cannot allocate their income to the museums trips, so free admissions and entrance fee will facilitate for those children to acquire more adeptly prehistoric knowledge in the museums.
On top of that, I am in favor of that fee for the museums should be free because that way is propulsion for museums to flourish. Correspondingly, the money that museums get from their customers will be used to better their facilities and services. In fact, although museums are allocated by governments from the taxes, that is insufficient for them to refurbish their equipment because of the chronological sabotaging. Moreover, if those whose occupation related to historic domains were paid desirably, they experience a higher level of ambition and motivation to attain more achievements what aggressively contribute to social understanding.
In conclusion, despite various sensible advantages of complimentary fee of museums, I believe that cost is an imperative for museums to thrive.
It is true that the
museum
is a nonprofit activity that
is engineered
to provoke the educational environment.
Therefore
, the proposal of the complimentary cost of entry
fees
for students is
very
precise.
However
, I reckon that the
museum
should charge and this essay will address
some
reasons for both sides.
On the one hand,
plenty
of advocates of students not paying for
museums
could cite various compelling reasons, one of which is that most
museums
have raised the colossal amount of money in governmental sponsorship which
is extracted
from residents' taxes.
Therefore
, if
people
were charged
with the
museums
, they would consider that their budget which
are obligated
to
be collected
by political organization monthly
are overused
in the other purposes
but
not to enhance the
museums
. Another possible reason is poverty-stricken children
being exposed
to the adept knowledge of
museums
.
In other words
, in
some
developing countries
,
some
families are
so
poor that they
diametrically
cannot allocate their income to the
museums
trips,
so
free admissions and entrance
fee
will facilitate for those children to acquire more
adeptly
prehistoric knowledge in the museums.
On top of that
, I am in favor of that
fee
for the
museums
should be free
because
that way is propulsion for
museums
to flourish.
Correspondingly
, the money that
museums
get
from their customers will be
used
to better their facilities and services. In fact, although
museums
are allocated
by
governments
from the taxes,
that is
insufficient for them to refurbish their equipment
because
of the chronological sabotaging.
Moreover
, if those whose occupation related to historic domains
were paid
desirably
, they experience a higher level of ambition and motivation to attain more achievements what
aggressively
contribute to social understanding.
In conclusion
, despite various sensible advantages of complimentary
fee
of
museums
, I believe that cost is an imperative for
museums
to thrive.