the media is frequently criticised for sendationalising the news with dramatic and often misleading language to sell stories, rather than reporting the facts. some people argue that this practice makes news reports accible and more engaging to the public, while others think that it generates false impreession at the expense of accuracy. how far do you agree with either of these views?
the media is frequently criticised for sendationalising the news with dramatic and often misleading language to sell stories, rather than reporting the facts. some people argue that this practice makes news reports accible and more engaging to the public, while others think that it generates false impreession at the expense of accuracy. how far do you agree with either of these views? 70D8y
In today’s modern life, the news is easily accessible to everyone. A lot of news with sensitive headlines and untrue content appeared. Many people believe that is a good way to increase the value of news and attract readers, whilst others people think that is a bad impression and be responsible for a large fine.
On the one hand, sensational headlines will attract more readers. Most people enjoy watching new, clips with sensation titles, hot topics to watch drama happenings. According to data from a recent post, the number of viewers for a post with sensational headlines is twice the number of viewers for normal news, most of which are young people. Besides, the content of the reading is edited incorrectly to attract readers. The poster often adds some details that make the readers curious, misunderstand the information so that they always follow the story. Their reading always has a certain number of followers. For example, I once read the post with the title: ” The death in the market”. I was curious and excited to read it because it was related to the law. It made me spend 5 minutes of my life reading the death of a fish in the market.
On the other hand, sensational headlines will leave a bad impression on readers. They read the news with sensational headlines but not great content. They will pay attention to the poster and website, they limit reading the later posts or block the website. Currently, there are many online newspapers that have lost the trust of readers and the number of viewers has decreased significantly. Moreover, the poster must be held responsible and fined for writing untrue content. The content of the news is untrue, affects other people’s lives, and causes misunderstandings for the online community. Such news is against the law. For instance, a journalist reported falsely about the covid, one of the hot topics today He wrote that place A had a person died from covid that made the public afraid. He was fined 50 million VND.
In conclusion, sensational headlines are a good way to attract readers, but they are not good if overused. In my opinion, I totally agree that sensational titles will leave a bad impression on readers and the poster must be held responsible for them.
In
today
’s modern life, the
news
is
easily
accessible to everyone.
A lot of
news
with sensitive
headlines
and untrue
content
appeared.
Many
people
believe
that is
a
good
way to increase the value of
news
and
attract
readers, whilst others
people
think
that is
a
bad
impression and be responsible for a large fine.
On the one hand,
sensational
headlines
will
attract
more readers. Most
people
enjoy watching
new
, clips with sensation titles, hot topics to
watch
drama happenings. According to data from a recent
post
, the
number
of viewers for a
post
with
sensational
headlines
is twice the
number
of viewers for normal
news
, most of which are young
people
.
Besides
, the
content
of the
reading
is edited
incorrectly
to
attract
readers. The
poster
often
adds
some
details
that
make
the readers curious, misunderstand the information
so
that they always follow the story. Their
reading
always has a certain
number
of followers.
For example
, I once read the
post
with the title:
”
The death in the market”. I was curious and excited to read it
because
it
was related
to the law. It made me spend 5 minutes of my life
reading
the death of a fish in the market.
On the other hand
,
sensational
headlines
will
leave
a
bad
impression on readers. They read the
news
with
sensational
headlines
but
not great
content
. They will pay attention to the
poster
and website, they limit
reading
the later
posts
or block the website.
Currently
, there are
many
online newspapers that have lost the trust of readers and the
number
of viewers has decreased
significantly
.
Moreover
, the
poster
must
be held
responsible and fined for writing untrue
content
. The
content
of the
news
is untrue, affects other
people’s
lives
, and causes misunderstandings for the online community. Such
news
is against the law.
For instance
, a journalist reported
falsely
about the
covid
, one of the hot topics
today
He wrote that place A had a person
died
from
covid
that made the public afraid. He
was fined
50 million VND.
In conclusion
,
sensational
headlines
are a
good
way to
attract
readers,
but
they are not
good
if overused. In my opinion, I
totally
agree
that
sensational
titles will
leave
a
bad
impression on readers and the
poster
must
be held
responsible for them.