Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line shows the comparison of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.

The line shows the comparison of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. a7jww
The line shows the comparison of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. Overall, the production energy of gas, coal, other, and nuclear increased in 1995 wheres the petro energy which was producted declined in 2005. In 1995, the most of prominence energy were gas and coal, which accounted for more than a half the production of energy. Besides, nuclear and others ingredients energy sources created the least amount of energy in France. Essentially, other types of energy production weren’t change much Throughout the period from 1995 to 2005, coal an increased of about1. 13% to 30. 93%; gas generated 29. 63% in 1995, which grew 30. 1% in 2005. While petrol remained the third biggest source of energy was decreased from 29. 27% in 1995 to 19. 35% in 2005. On the contrary, the amount of energy generated from nuclear and others were increased to 10. 10% and 9. 10% respectively. In short, it can be seen that petrol steadily over the 10-year period, while other sources like nuclear became more important.
The line
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
the comparison of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
in France in 1995 and 2005.

Overall
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
of gas, coal,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
, and nuclear increased in 1995
Possible spelling mistake found
wheres
the
Possible spelling mistake found.
petro
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
which was
Possible spelling mistake found.
producted
declined in 2005.

In 1995, the
Consider using "most prominence" or "most of the prominence".
most of prominence
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
Did you mean "where" or "we"?
were
gas and coal, which accounted for more than a half the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
.
Besides
, nuclear
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
and others
ingredients
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
sources created the least amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
in France.
Essentially
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
weren’t
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
much

Throughout the period from 1995 to 2005, coal an increased of about1. 13% to 30. 93%; gas generated 29. 63% in 1995, which grew 30. 1% in 2005.
“While” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
While
petrol remained the third biggest source of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
was decreased
from 29. 27% in 1995 to 19. 35% in 2005.
On the contrary
, the amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
generated from nuclear
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
and others
were increased
to 10. 10% and 9. 10%
respectively
. In short, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that petrol
steadily
over the 10-year period, while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
sources like nuclear became more
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The line shows the comparison of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
174 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The line shows the comparison of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.