The lecture and the article are both about buzzers who personally promote the products to people they know or meet. The article feels that buzzing has generated a lot of controversy and provide three possible reasons. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the article, He is of the belief that these explanations are faulty.
To begin with, the writer states that the consumers should know that the people who promote the products are paied to advertise product and may give the incorrect information about the products. The specific argument is challenged by the lecture, he claims that buzzers merely tell the truth. The companeis look for consumers who are satisfied from products and employ them to not only adverties the merchendise but also give the people correct information.
Secondly, The reading mentions that when buzzers pretent they are private individuales, people thrust them more than advertisers. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that people are very carefull and ask a lot of questions about the price, the arriving services and how long they can recieve the produts. Therefore they do not just rely on others and evaluate different aspect of the goody.
Last but not least, The article posits that buzzing can affect social relationships and spread of mistrust between people. In contrast, the lecture position is that because the buzzers tell only the truth about goodies, the connection between people can be stiffer and the comunication and social connection increase during the time.
The lecture and the
article
are both about buzzers who
personally
promote the
products
to
people
they know or
meet
. The
article
feels that buzzing has generated
a lot of
controversy and provide three possible reasons.
The
lecturer challenges the claim made by the
article
, He is of the belief that these explanations are faulty.
To
begin
with, the writer states that the consumers should know that the
people
who promote the
products
are
paied
to advertise
product
and may give the incorrect information about the
products
. The specific argument
is challenged
by the lecture, he claims that buzzers
merely
tell
the truth. The
companeis
look for consumers who
are satisfied
from
products
and employ them to not
only
adverties
the
merchendise
but
also
give the
people
correct information.
Secondly
, The reading mentions that when buzzers
pretent
they are private
individuales
,
people
thrust them more than advertisers. The lecturer,
however
, rebuts this by mentioning that
people
are
very
carefull
and ask
a lot of
questions about the price, the arriving services and how long they can
recieve
the
produts
.
Therefore
they do not
just
rely on others and evaluate
different
aspect of the goody.
Last
but
not least, The
article
posits that buzzing can affect social relationships and spread of mistrust between
people
.
In contrast
, the lecture position is that
because
the buzzers
tell
only
the truth about goodies, the
connection between
people
can be stiffer and the
comunication
and social connection increase during the time.