The lecture and the article are both about buzzers who personally promote the products to people they know or meet. The article feels that buzzing has generated a lot of controversy and provide three possible reasons. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the article, He is of the belief that these explanations are faulty.
To begin with, the writer states that the consumers should know that the people who promote the products are paied to advertise product and may give the incorrect information about the products. The specific argument is challenged by the lecture, he claims that buzzers merely tell the truth. The companeis look for consumers who are satisfied from products and employ them to not only adverties the merchendise but also give the people correct information.
Secondly, The reading mentions that when buzzers pretent they are private individuales, people thrust them more than advertisers. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that people are very carefull and ask a lot of questions about the price, the arriving services and how long they can recieve the produts. Therefore they do not just rely on others and evaluate different aspect of the goody.
Last but not least, The article posits that buzzing can affect social relationships and spread of mistrust between people. In contrast, the lecture position is that because the buzzers tell only the truth about goodies, the connection between people can be stiffer and the comunication and social connection increase during the time. 
The lecture and the  
article
 are both about buzzers who  
personally
 promote the  
products
 to  
people
 they know or  
meet
. The  
article
 feels that buzzing has generated  
a lot of
 controversy and provide three possible reasons.  
The
 lecturer challenges the claim made by the  
article
, He is of the belief that these explanations are faulty.
To  
begin
 with, the writer states that the consumers should know that the  
people
 who promote the  
products
 are  
paied
 to advertise  
product
 and may give the incorrect information about the  
products
. The specific argument  
is challenged
 by the lecture, he claims that buzzers  
merely
  tell
 the truth. The  
companeis
 look for consumers who  
are satisfied
 from  
products
 and employ them to not  
only
  adverties
 the  
merchendise
  but
  also
 give the  
people
 correct information. 
Secondly
, The reading mentions that when buzzers  
pretent
 they are private  
individuales
,  
people
 thrust them more than advertisers. The lecturer,  
however
, rebuts this by mentioning that  
people
 are  
very
  carefull
 and ask  
a lot of
 questions about the price, the arriving services and how long they can  
recieve
 the  
produts
.  
Therefore
 they do not  
just
 rely on others and evaluate  
different
 aspect of the goody.
Last  
but
 not least, The  
article
 posits that buzzing can affect social relationships and spread of mistrust between  
people
.  
In contrast
, the lecture position is that  
because
 the buzzers  
tell
  only
 the truth about goodies, the  
connection between
  people
 can be stiffer and the  
comunication
 and social connection increase during the time.