The article discusses about the fire policy. It mentioned three reseons to show how this policy influenced the environment after a fire. The passage gave three reasons to question the effectiveness of so-called let it burn policy.
First, the man in the reading thinks that this action resulted in destruction of green environment with letting it totally burn out. However, the woman in the lecture completely disagrees with this belief. She feels that after the burning new plants and species have had the chance to growth and thrive while, normally, they had not the opportunity before.
Second, the article believes that the fire had a huge impact on wildlife as it ruined most of the animals’ habitats forever. But, the women states that the place have recovered itself after the fire incident. Also, the population of animals continue to grow incresingly forward. In addition, in the forest by this destruction, the environment have become convenient for some other animals like rabbits and hares to thrive in this area gradually.
Third, the passage indicates that this event caused the tourists to choose other places to visit and this subsequently damaged the economy of the region. on the other hand, in the lecture the expert illustrates that beside the fire, there were other factors like low rain fall and harsh speedy winds which helped to the 1988 fire issue accordingly. Moreover, she thinks that this was a one-time disaster which is never going to happen again and the visitors would definately come back to see the place. As, it gained its old beautiful landscape. 
The article  
discusses about the
  fire
 policy. It mentioned three  
reseons
 to  
show
 how this policy influenced the environment after a  
fire
. The passage gave three reasons to question the effectiveness of  
so
-called  
let
 it burn policy. 
First
, the  
man
 in the reading  
thinks
 that this action resulted in destruction of green environment with letting it  
totally
 burn out.  
However
, the woman in the lecture completely disagrees with this belief. She feels that after the burning new plants and species have had the chance to growth and thrive while,  
normally
, they had not the opportunity  
before
.
Second, the article believes that the  
fire
 had a huge impact on wildlife as it ruined most of the animals’ habitats forever.  
But
, the women states that the place have recovered itself after the  
fire
 incident.  
Also
, the population of animals continue to grow  
incresingly
 forward.  
In addition
, in the forest by this destruction, the environment have become convenient for  
some
  other
 animals like rabbits and hares to thrive in this area  
gradually
.
Third, the passage indicates that this  
event
 caused the tourists to choose  
other
 places to visit and this  
subsequently
 damaged the economy of the region.  
on
 the  
other
 hand, in the lecture the expert illustrates that beside the  
fire
, there were  
other
 factors like low rain fall and harsh speedy winds which  
helped
 to the 1988  
fire
 issue  
accordingly
.  
Moreover
, she  
thinks
 that this was a one-time disaster which is never going to happen again and the visitors would  
definately
  come
 back to  
see
 the place.  
As
, it gained its  
old
  beautiful
 landscape.