The article discusses about the fire policy. It mentioned three reseons to show how this policy influenced the environment after a fire. The passage gave three reasons to question the effectiveness of so-called let it burn policy.
First, the man in the reading thinks that this action resulted in destruction of green environment with letting it totally burn out. However, the woman in the lecture completely disagrees with this belief. She feels that after the burning new plants and species have had the chance to growth and thrive while, normally, they had not the opportunity before.
Second, the article believes that the fire had a huge impact on wildlife as it ruined most of the animals’ habitats forever. But, the women states that the place have recovered itself after the fire incident. Also, the population of animals continue to grow incresingly forward. In addition, in the forest by this destruction, the environment have become convenient for some other animals like rabbits and hares to thrive in this area gradually.
Third, the passage indicates that this event caused the tourists to choose other places to visit and this subsequently damaged the economy of the region. on the other hand, in the lecture the expert illustrates that beside the fire, there were other factors like low rain fall and harsh speedy winds which helped to the 1988 fire issue accordingly. Moreover, she thinks that this was a one-time disaster which is never going to happen again and the visitors would definately come back to see the place. As, it gained its old beautiful landscape.
The article
discusses about the
fire
policy. It mentioned three
reseons
to
show
how this policy influenced the environment after a
fire
. The passage gave three reasons to question the effectiveness of
so
-called
let
it burn policy.
First
, the
man
in the reading
thinks
that this action resulted in destruction of green environment with letting it
totally
burn out.
However
, the woman in the lecture completely disagrees with this belief. She feels that after the burning new plants and species have had the chance to growth and thrive while,
normally
, they had not the opportunity
before
.
Second, the article believes that the
fire
had a huge impact on wildlife as it ruined most of the animals’ habitats forever.
But
, the women states that the place have recovered itself after the
fire
incident.
Also
, the population of animals continue to grow
incresingly
forward.
In addition
, in the forest by this destruction, the environment have become convenient for
some
other
animals like rabbits and hares to thrive in this area
gradually
.
Third, the passage indicates that this
event
caused the tourists to choose
other
places to visit and this
subsequently
damaged the economy of the region.
on
the
other
hand, in the lecture the expert illustrates that beside the
fire
, there were
other
factors like low rain fall and harsh speedy winds which
helped
to the 1988
fire
issue
accordingly
.
Moreover
, she
thinks
that this was a one-time disaster which is never going to happen again and the visitors would
definately
come
back to
see
the place.
As
, it gained its
old
beautiful
landscape.