It’s commonly argued that learning a new language is inefficient while having a quick and precise technology ability to translate. I disagree with this idea and I believe that being able to speak a foreign language is consequently essential however how quickly automation devices are developing.
First, I believe that learning a foreign language instead of using computers makes communication faster. And this is due to the time it takes to open the device and type the sentence to get a translation that delays the conversation. Having the ability to speak a language makes understanding and replying to immediate action. Such as, when someone would like to communicate with their French teacher having the capability of understanding the language speeds up the conversation. In general, I think having the skill of realizing what the others are saying and replying without using computers is much faster.
Secondly, I suppose that Relying on technology is unhelpful in cases where there is no access to it. because computers are not always available to be used. Furthermore, it is forbidden to use any devices in a number of conditions, which makes it impossible to communicate without knowing the language. For instance, when someone arrives in a new country, they usually don’t have access to the internet or can’t use their phones in the checking points, consequently, they won't be able to contact. Thus, depending only on technology is not all the time possible, which can disappoint you in many cases.
To conclude, I strongly believe that having the ability to speak a foreign language is essential and that we can’t rely on technology alone. in light of the fact that it is faster in communication and also that computers are not always available.
It’s
commonly
argued that learning a new
language
is inefficient while
having
a quick and precise
technology
ability to translate. I disagree with this
idea
and I believe that being able to speak a foreign
language
is
consequently
essential
however
how
quickly
automation devices are developing.
First
, I believe that learning a foreign
language
instead
of using computers
makes
communication faster. And this is due to the time it takes to open the device and type the sentence to
get
a translation that delays the conversation.
Having
the ability to speak a
language
makes
understanding and replying to immediate action. Such as, when someone would like to communicate with their French teacher
having
the capability of understanding the
language
speeds up
the conversation.
In general
, I
think
having
the
skill
of realizing what the others are saying and replying without using computers is much faster.
Secondly
, I suppose that Relying on
technology
is unhelpful in cases where there is no access to it.
because
computers are not always available to be
used
.
Furthermore
, it
is forbidden
to
use
any devices in a number of conditions, which
makes
it impossible to communicate without knowing the
language
.
For instance
, when someone arrives in a new country, they
usually
don’t have access to the internet or can’t
use
their phones in the checking points,
consequently
, they won't be able to contact.
Thus
, depending
only
on
technology
is not all the time possible, which can disappoint you in
many
cases.
To conclude
, I
strongly
believe that
having
the ability to speak a foreign
language
is essential and that we can’t rely on
technology
alone.
in
light of the fact that it is faster in communication and
also
that computers are not always available.