Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The government's investment in art, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. v.2

The government's investment in art, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. v. 2
The public spending has always been a thought-provoking issue in all the societies. It is argued that the governments ought to allocate resources to community facilities rather than squander money on entertainment. Even though, I believe that art may be crucial for certain demographics of population, the prime concern of the authorities is rendering the decent living standards to the nation. On the one hand, a comprehensive individual’s development is impossible without cultural interference. This means that professional career along with day-to-day chores are unable to provide entire fulfilment to a person. Throughout the history from the ancient Greek amphitheatres to the modern digital multimedia, humanity has craved for amusement that cultivates self-identification as a species. For example, during the Renaissance period many prominent inventors and discoverers scooped inspiration from art, which enables them to perform their works that left significant footprint in history. In other words, many modern social boons would have been otherwise impossible without existence of art. On the other hand, some countries opt to contribute to art sacrificing vital funds that can be rendered to education, medicine and other important social institutes. In other words, entertainment industries may be exorbitantly expensive for the state budget, while the production of artworks is surely subjective. Proceeding from this, in terms of purely financial perspective, such governmental initiatives are highly unlikely to pay off. On the contrary, the returns from social benefits deriving from strong public services are explicit and encompass entire nation’s wellbeing. Thus, there is no doubt that community facilities reinforcement to be on the top of political agenda. In conclusion, although no universal opinion exists to the question of whether country leaders should allot taxpayers’ money to public institutes or entertainment, I am of the opinion that a society is clearly better off from the well-funded public services.
The
public
spending has always been a
thought
-provoking issue in all the societies. It
is argued
that the
governments
ought to allocate resources to community facilities
rather
than squander money on entertainment.
Even though
, I believe that art may be crucial for certain demographics of population, the prime concern of the authorities is rendering the decent living standards to the nation.

On the one hand, a comprehensive individual’s development is impossible without cultural interference. This means that professional career along with day-to-day chores are unable to provide entire
fulfilment
to a person. Throughout the history from the ancient Greek
amphitheatres
to the modern digital multimedia, humanity has craved for amusement that cultivates self-identification as a species.
For example
, during the Renaissance period
many
prominent inventors and discoverers scooped inspiration from art, which enables them to perform their works that
left
significant footprint in history. In
other
words,
many
modern social boons would have been
otherwise
impossible without existence of art.

On the
other
hand,
some
countries opt to contribute to art sacrificing vital funds that can
be rendered
to education, medicine and
other
important
social institutes. In
other
words, entertainment industries may be
exorbitantly
expensive for the state budget, while the production of artworks is
surely
subjective. Proceeding from this, in terms of
purely
financial perspective, such governmental initiatives are
highly
unlikely to pay off.
On the contrary
, the returns from social benefits deriving from strong
public
services are explicit and encompass entire nation’s
wellbeing
.
Thus
, there is no doubt that community
facilities
reinforcement to be on the top of political agenda.

In conclusion
, although no universal opinion exists to
the question of whether
country leaders should allot taxpayers’ money to
public
institutes or entertainment, I am of the opinion that a society is
clearly
better off from the well-funded
public
services.
18Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes

IELTS essay The government's investment in art, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. v. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
302 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts