Whether the government should spend more money on environmental improving programs or artistic supporting programs seems to be controversial. A number of people believe that the government should pay more attention on supporting artistic actions; however, I tend to believe that it is more reasonable for governors to spend more budget on environmental programs. I feel this way for two reasons which I would explode in what follows.
To begin with, in my opinion, improving the public transportation is one of the most efficient actions that the government should spend a big part of their budget on it. When the government spend more money on progressing the public transportation, people will be motivated and encouraged to make use of their personal cars less rather than the past. Due to less making use of personal vehicles, traffic, air pollution, and even noise pollution will be decreased. As a result, the community will be healthier and more active. Also, by an advanced public transportation system, the government will be able to earn more money, and they can investigate their income in other sections such as cultural parts, educational parts, and economic parts.
Another subtle point is that the government should informs some works on reducing the number of factories and industrial buildings that are harmful for the nature and exist surround of the cities. Produced pollutions by these factories can destroy animals’ habitats and plants. Animals have to leave their niches. As a result, the whole ecosystem will be destroyed, but by spending money on environmental improving programs the government can transfer some harmful factories to other areas that are really far away from rural and urban areas. These activities can help to increase more animals breeding and more green areas in the society.
According to the reasons have been discussed in the preceding paragraphs. It can be claimed that it is more logical for the government to spend more money on environmental improving programs because by this activity they will build a more dynamic and healthier society.
Whether the
government
should
spend
more
money
on
environmental
improving
programs
or artistic supporting
programs
seems to be controversial. A number of
people
believe that the
government
should pay more attention on supporting artistic actions;
however
, I tend to believe that it is more reasonable for governors to
spend
more budget on
environmental
programs
. I feel this way for two reasons which I would explode in what follows.
To
begin
with, in my opinion,
improving
the public transportation is one of the most efficient actions that the
government
should
spend
a
big
part of their budget on it. When the
government
spend
more
money
on progressing the public transportation,
people
will
be motivated
and encouraged to
make
use
of their personal cars less
rather
than the past. Due to less making
use
of personal vehicles, traffic, air pollution, and even noise pollution will
be decreased
.
As a result
, the community will be healthier and more active.
Also
, by an advanced public transportation system, the
government
will be able to earn more
money
, and they can investigate their income in other sections such as cultural parts, educational parts, and economic parts.
Another subtle point is that the
government
should
informs
some
works on reducing the number of factories and industrial buildings that are harmful for the nature and exist surround of the cities. Produced pollutions by these factories can
destroy
animals’ habitats and plants. Animals
have to
leave
their niches.
As a result
, the whole ecosystem will be
destroyed
,
but
by spending
money
on
environmental
improving
programs
the
government
can transfer
some
harmful factories to other areas that are
really
far away from rural and urban areas. These activities can
help
to increase more animals breeding and more green areas in the society.
According to the reasons have
been discussed
in the preceding paragraphs. It can
be claimed
that it is more logical for the
government
to
spend
more
money
on
environmental
improving
programs
because
by this activity they will build a more dynamic and healthier society.