In this day and age, the issue of car banning in all centers has attracted much concern of the public. While some people hold the view that this exerts positive impacts on solving traffic congestion, others tend to cling to that this could lead to some certain disadvantages. This essay aims to shed light on both ideas in detail.
From the one side, permission cars flowing in the town centers brings about a number of benefits. One of the most outstanding upsides is convenience, which can help locals avoid bad weather such as rain, sun or snow. As a result, people do not have to suffer from slipped roads, which might lead to serious accidents. Furthermore, if cars are banned in the towns, which could jeopardize the national budget. It cannot be denied that the taxes from cars in these areas are huge. If the amount of money from this kind of taxes reduces, many policies will be seriously affected. Hanoi serves an example, the money from cars has boosted the economic growth from 5% to 8% in recent 10 years.
From the other side, banning cars in the towns should be of benefit to some certain aspects. Firstly, it positively affects traffic. There is no doubt that not only could this policy reduce traffic jams, but this might encourage residents to use buses or trains as well. A recent survey has shown that the rate of passengers using public transports increased 30% thanks to this policy. Another vital merit of banning cars is pollution reduction. When cars are banned, the emission, gases or noises from this kind of means of transport also falls. Facts have shown that the smoke from the cars is twice higher than other vehicles.
In conclusion, when it comes to the issue of car banning in all town centers, there are two contrasting ideas analyzed above. On the whole, I am inclined to believe that this policy can do more good than harm. The government should take this into account in order to have more reasonable and practical measures.
In this day and age, the issue of
car
banning
in all centers has attracted much concern of the public. While
some
people
hold the view that this exerts
positive
impacts on solving traffic congestion, others tend to cling to that this could lead to
some
certain disadvantages. This essay aims to shed light on both
ideas
in detail.
From the one side, permission
cars
flowing in the
town
centers brings about a number of benefits. One of the most outstanding upsides is convenience, which can
help
locals avoid
bad
weather such as rain, sun or snow.
As a result
,
people
do not
have to
suffer from slipped roads, which might lead to serious accidents.
Furthermore
, if
cars
are banned
in the
towns
, which could jeopardize the national budget. It cannot
be denied
that the taxes from
cars
in these areas are huge. If the amount of money from this kind of taxes
reduces
,
many
policies
will be
seriously
affected
. Hanoi serves an example, the money from
cars
has boosted the economic growth from 5% to 8% in recent 10 years.
From the other side,
banning
cars
in the
towns
should be of benefit to
some
certain aspects.
Firstly
, it
positively
affects traffic. There is no doubt that not
only
could this
policy
reduce
traffic jams,
but
this might encourage residents to
use
buses or trains
as well
. A recent survey has shown that the rate of passengers using public transports increased 30% thanks to this
policy
. Another vital merit of
banning
cars
is pollution reduction. When
cars
are banned
, the emission, gases or noises from this kind of means of transport
also
falls. Facts have shown that the smoke from the
cars
is twice higher than other vehicles.
In conclusion
, when it
comes
to the issue of
car
banning
in all
town
centers, there are two contrasting
ideas
analyzed above.
On the whole
, I
am inclined
to believe that this
policy
can do more
good
than harm. The
government
should take this into account in order to have more reasonable and practical measures.