Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The government should impose limits on the amount of waste produced by household. what extent do you agree or disagree ?

The government should impose limits on the amount of waste produced by household. what extent OMp6E
Some experts suggest that the center should create limits on the amount of garbage generation from household work. If questioned, to a large extent I bolster with the laid motif. My opinion is justified further in the ensuing paragraphs. The foremost argument to support my viewpoint is that this law prevents excessive pollution of land resources. If the waste is burned, then it would create air pollution. Therefore, this policy can prohibit both the land as well as air pollution to get rid of preexisting impurities. As a result, this limitation would create a continuous generation of waste. Moreover, it reduces the spread of disease. In other words, people are living near the landfill might suffer from several airborne diseases, as the waste is created by households becomes toxic after a few days or a few hours. Furthermore, waste processing units across the world have been working around the clock to get rid of excess waste. To put it simply, imposing on the dumping of garbage by households could lead to better waste management and more efficient disposal of waste. Besides, the government can start the door-to-door service of collection of waste; thereby, the amount of waste on landfills can be declined. However, I could not disregard another side of this situation. To being with, the government also has various works other than managing the waste. In simple words, the higher authority has too much burden on their shoulder, so if public or NGOs can take responsibility of controlling waste. For instance, in the USA other than the government, the general public takes care of the amount of waste, consequently, this was created a better place to live in America. Thus, to conclude, it can be eventually commented that the authority ought to make policies regarding produce wastage and my inclination perfectly can demonstrate this policy is better because this curb the pollution and diseases. Nevertheless, individuals can also take this responsibility.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
experts suggest that the center should create limits on the amount of garbage generation from household work. If questioned, to a large extent I bolster with the laid motif. My opinion
is justified
further
in the ensuing paragraphs.

The foremost argument to support my viewpoint is that this law
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevents
excessive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
of land resources. If the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
is burned
, then it would create air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
.
Therefore
, this policy can prohibit both the land
Probable usage error. Use "and" after 'both'.
as well as
air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
rid of preexisting impurities.
As a result
, this limitation would create a continuous generation of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
.
Moreover
, it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduces
the spread of disease.
In other words
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
are living near the landfill might suffer from several airborne diseases, as the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
is created
by households becomes toxic after a few days or a few hours.

Furthermore
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
processing units across the world have been working around the clock to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
rid of excess
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
. To put it
simply
, imposing on the dumping of garbage by households could lead to better
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
management and more efficient disposal of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
.
Besides
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
the door-to-door service of collection of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
; thereby, the amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
on landfills can
be declined
.

However
, I could not disregard another side of this situation. To
Did you mean "begin"?
being
with, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
also
has various works other than managing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
. In simple words, the higher authority has too much burden on their shoulder,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
if public or NGOs can take responsibility of controlling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
.
For instance
, in the USA other than the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
, the
Consider using "public".
general public
takes care of the amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
,
consequently
, this
was created
a better place to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
in America.

Thus
,
to conclude
, it can be
eventually
commented that the authority ought to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
policies regarding produce wastage and my inclination
perfectly
can demonstrate this policy is better
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
this curb the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
and diseases.
Nevertheless
, individuals can
also
take this responsibility.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The government should impose limits on the amount of waste produced by household. what extent

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
322 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The government should impose limits on the amount of waste produced by household. what extent do you agree or disagree ?