Allocating government budget for learning science is controversial. Some people claim that a nation can develop and progress if the government can allocate excess funds for teaching science rather than other subjects. I strongly agree with this statement. A country's future development and progression are dependent on science graduates because they bring in revenue to the government and they provide better health to civilians.
Firstly, engineers are a major source of income to the government. In other words, these science graduates are salaried and they pay back all the taxes honestly. Unlike entrepreneurs these graduates do not escape from duties towards the nation. Indeed, authorities spend extensive budget to build engineering and medical schools. In addition, they also bring international recognition to a country. For instance, multinational companies like Infosys bring in an enormous amount of money to an organisation or to the nation. Overall, a nation can develop economically if it concentrates more on investing in teaching science subjects at university level.
Secondly, a country's progress is assessed by the quality of health that the government can provide to the citizens. Correspondingly, infant mortality rate of developed countries is significantly less than developing nation. So, doctors contribute considerably in bringing down these mortality rates. Further, doctors are service-oriented and do take good care of the society by creating awareness about hygiene and nutrition. For instance, the UK ministry reinforces more money to improve the quality of medical education and therefore they have the best health care system in the world.
To conclude, science graduates like engineers and doctors bring in a lot of money and also enhance the health of citizens. Finally, it is worth investing ministry funds on these science subjects.
Allocating
government
budget for learning
science
is controversial.
Some
people
claim that a
nation
can develop and progress if the
government
can allocate excess funds for teaching
science
rather
than other subjects. I
strongly
agree
with this statement. A country's future development and progression are dependent on
science
graduates
because
they
bring
in revenue to the
government and
they provide better
health
to civilians.
Firstly
, engineers are a major source of income to the
government
.
In other words
, these
science
graduates
are
salaried and
they pay back all the taxes
honestly
. Unlike entrepreneurs these
graduates
do not escape from duties towards the
nation
.
Indeed
, authorities spend extensive budget to build engineering and medical schools.
In addition
, they
also
bring
international recognition to a country.
For instance
, multinational
companies
like
Infosys
bring
in an enormous amount of money to an
organisation
or to the
nation
.
Overall
, a
nation
can develop
economically
if it concentrates more on investing in teaching
science
subjects at university level.
Secondly
, a country's progress
is assessed
by the quality of
health
that the
government
can provide to the citizens.
Correspondingly
, infant mortality rate of
developed countries
is
significantly
less than developing
nation
.
So
, doctors contribute
considerably
in bringing down these mortality rates.
Further
, doctors are service-oriented and do take
good
care of the society by creating awareness about hygiene and nutrition.
For instance
, the UK ministry reinforces more money to
improve
the quality of medical education and
therefore
they have the best
health
care system in the world.
To conclude
,
science
graduates
like engineers and doctors
bring
in
a lot of
money and
also
enhance the
health
of citizens.
Finally
, it is worth investing ministry funds on these
science
subjects.