Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue. Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth, while others claim that it damages local industries. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. You shoul v.6

The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue. Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth, while others claim that it damages local industries. You shoul v. 6
One of the most debatable issues of the last century has been the extent to which international trade benefits or harms national economies. Many arguments have been made for and against free trade between nations. In this essay, I will discuss both views and state my own position. Those who support the expansion of global free trade claim that economies grow faster when they can specialise in just a few industries in which they have a strong advantage. As a result, each region or country produces something of value to the world economy. For example, East Asia manufactures electronic goods, the Middle East exports energy, and the EU produces luxury items. Free trade proponents claim that dependence on global trade helps to strengthen international cooperation and prevent wars. Meanwhile, opponents of free trade—sometimes called ‘protectionists’—claim that the unrestricted movement of goods and services causes damage to local communities. This is because jobs are lost when it becomes cheaper to import a product than to produce it domestically. They also argue that the vast distances travelled by food, oil, and consumer goods is harming the environment and making our lives unsustainable. Protectionists are in favour of tighter controls on the movement of goods and services in order to protect jobs and livelihoods. In conclusion, while there are convincing arguments on both sides of the debate, a return to protectionist policies would surely be a mistake. I believe that global trade is inevitable and should not be restricted. It is no longer realistic for nations to source all of their energy, food, and manufactured goods within their own borders.
One of the most debatable issues of the last century has been the extent to which international
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trade
benefits or harms national economies.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
arguments have
been made
for and against
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trade
between nations. In this essay, I will discuss both views and state my
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
position.

Those who support the expansion of global
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trade
claim that economies grow faster when they can
Possible spelling mistake. 'specialise' is British English.
specialise
in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
a few industries in which they have a strong advantage.
As a result
, each region or country produces something of value to the world economy.
For example
, East Asia manufactures electronic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
goods
, the Middle East exports energy, and the EU produces luxury items.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trade
proponents claim that dependence on global
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trade
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
to strengthen international cooperation and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevent
wars.

Meanwhile, opponents of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
free
trade—
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
called ‘protectionists’—claim that the unrestricted movement of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
goods
and services causes damage to local communities. This is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
jobs
are lost
when it becomes cheaper to import a product than to produce it
domestically
. They
also
argue that the vast distances travelled by food, oil, and consumer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
goods
is harming the environment and making our
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
unsustainable. Protectionists are in
Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.
favour
of tighter controls on the movement of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
goods
and services in order to protect jobs and livelihoods.

In conclusion
, while there are convincing arguments on both sides of the debate, a return to protectionist policies would
surely
be a mistake. I believe that global
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trade
is inevitable and should not
be restricted
. It is no longer realistic for nations to source all of their energy, food, and manufactured
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
goods
within their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
borders.
6Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
15Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes
You can never understand one language until you understand at least two.
Geoffrey Willans

IELTS essay The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue. Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth, while others claim that it damages local industries. You shoul v. 6

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
267 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts