The central themes in this chapter are the disintegration of the international
economy — de-globalization — which followed the onset of the Great Depression,
and the path to recovery in the main areas of the world. Cooperation was
desperately needed to mitigate the effects of the slump, but it was not
forthcoming. The European nations and the United States displayed disharmony
and rivalry at the World Economic Conference of 1933. Each country had its own
agenda and priorities; the world economy broke up into separate trading areas.
The sterling area fared the best as a result of Britain's devaluation. India and
Latin America are special cases within the sterling area. The gold bloc retained
the gold standard and fared the worst. The United States and Soviet Union
pursued opposite policies toward recovery.
Another difficulty in returning to prewar patterns was created by the changes
that had occurred in world markets. Competitors whose economic circumstances
were affected relatively little by the war, notably the United States and Japan,
had seized the opportunity created by the inability of European manufacturers to
maintain their normal trading activity and had successfully invaded their
markets. Japan, in particular, rapidly increased her sales to many Asian
countries that had previously looked mainly to Britain for their imports.
Moreover, as we have seen, huge export capacity had been built by cheap
primary producers. The war also stimulated domestic production in nonEuropean countries in order to substitute for imports from Europe. This is what
happened, for example, to cotton textiles and other light manufactures in India
and Latin America, thereby reducing the markets upon which the prewar output
of the exporting nations had depended.
The central themes in this chapter are the disintegration of the international
economy —
de-globalization
— which followed the onset of the Great Depression,
and the path to recovery in the main areas of the
world
. Cooperation
was
desperately
needed to mitigate the effects of the slump,
but
it was not
forthcoming
. The European nations and the United States displayed
disharmony
and
rivalry at the
World
Economic Conference of 1933. Each country had its
own
agenda
and priorities; the
world
economy broke up into separate trading areas.
The sterling area fared the best
as a result
of Britain's devaluation. India
and
Latin America are special cases within the sterling area. The gold bloc
retained
the
gold standard and fared the worst. The United States and Soviet
Union
pursued
opposite policies toward recovery.
Another difficulty in returning to prewar patterns
was created
by the
changes
that
had occurred in
world
markets. Competitors whose economic
circumstances
were
affected
relatively
little
by the war,
notably
the United States and Japan,
had seized the opportunity created by the inability of European manufacturers to
maintain their normal trading activity and had
successfully
invaded their
markets
. Japan,
in particular
,
rapidly
increased her sales to
many
Asian
countries
that had previously looked
mainly
to Britain for their imports.
Moreover
, as we have
seen
, huge export capacity had
been built
by
cheap
primary
producers. The war
also
stimulated domestic production in
nonEuropean
countries in order to substitute for imports from Europe. This is
what
happened,
for example
, to cotton textiles and other light manufactures in India
and Latin America, thereby reducing the markets upon which the prewar output
of
the exporting nations had depended.