Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The following is a recommendation from the city manager of Bridge Bay.“Last year, the number of visits to our local beach in Bridge Bay was 50 percent lowerthan the year before. Early last year we ended our contract with Arko Trash Collection, acompany

The following is a recommendation from the city manager of Bridge Bay. “Last year, the number of visits to our local beach in Bridge Bay was 50 percent lowerthan the year before. Early last year we ended our contract with Arko Trash Collection, acompany xmxwa
The writer of this argument is the city manager of Bridge Bay who is hypothesizing that the beach's decrease in visitors last year is due to the ending of their contract with Arko Trash Collection. The writer states that last year the attendance was 50% lower than the year before when Arko Trash Collection was working as the garbage collectors. It is also stated that nearby beaches that continue to use Arko Trash Collection are experiencing a high number of visitors. The conclusion of the writer's argument is that in order to increase visitors to Bridge Bay, they need to fire the new garbage collectors Satellite Waste Corporation and resume contract with Arko Trash collection. The author's argument is a good attempt to figure out why attendance has decreased but it is not a valid or reliable argument due to the writer's lack of evidence, use of questionable assumptions and vague terminology; in order to have a reasonable argument the author needs to answer many questions which will be presented in this essay. It is stated that the attendance of the Bridge Beach by visitors was 50% lower last year than the year before. The author then states that this is due to the ending of the contract with Arko and the beginning of a new contract with Satellite. In order for this assumption to be validated, the author should address questions and define the vague terms used. To begin, how was the number 50% collected? It would be helpful for the writer to state whether this was collected through a reliable survey, because if this number was collected from weekend visitors two years before and then collected from weekday visitors this past year, the number decrease would not be comparable. Additionally, the reader of this argument needs to know the amount of trash that was collected in both years that are being compared. For example, what if two years ago the amount of trash was the same as the last year but in the last year many new beaches opened up in the area? This would suggest that the decrease in visitors was not due to the change in trash collectors but rather due to changes in the greater community. The writer continues to back up the conclusion with questionable assumptions when it is stated that Ocean Harbor, a nearby beach, that still uses Arko has " record levels of attendance. " The author uses this statement in an attempt to prove that the higher levels of visitors are due to Arko being the trash collectors, but again there is no evidence that the higher level of visitors is due to there being less trash. The writer needs to again provide statistics on the amount of trash collected by Arko at Ocean Harbor and provide details on the current state of the beach. For example, what if Ocean Harbor beach has more visitors this year due to the fact that they added rides and a boardwalk full of games? What if Ocean Harbor has calmer waters and offers a full bar and beach side food services? This could be the real reason why Ocean Harbor has more visitors and why Bridge Bay's visitor numbers have dropped. If the author describes the amenities present at each beach and it is proven that their amenities are then same, then demonstrates that there is more trash per square foot on Bridge Bay beach than on Ocean Harbor with valid statistics, then the argument would be stronger and reasonable; sadly, though, this is not the case in the argument presented. Finally the author uses the argument that there have been an increase in complaints about garbage on Bridge Bay this past year. The author forgets to add vital information here in order to successfully use this statement as proof to the conclusion. Who were those who complained? What if the increase in complaints of trash on the beach is from one single person who calls every day or multiple times a day? In order to have a stronger argument and use the complaints as proof that the decrease in visitors is due to an increase in trash, the writer needs to provide details on the content of the complaints, and how many people are complaining. In conclusion, it is important to address the garbage problem present on many beaches. In this argument, the city manager of Bridge Bay makes an unsubstantiated claim that their decrease in visitors last year is due to changing garbage collection agencies. The argument presented is not reasonable or reliable as the terms are vague and the assumptions presented have no validity or evidence to back them up. If the writer provides the reader with a comparison in amount of trash on the Bridge Bay beach in both years being compared and connects it to a decrease in visitors then the argument would be stronger. The writer additionally cannot successfully compare Bridge Bay beach to Ocean Harbor beach without discussing the amenities provided in both beaches and the amount of trash present per square foot. Finally the writer should provide more details about who is making complaints and what the content of the complaints are in order to have a stronger argument. With more research and work to answer the presented questions, the city manager will discover that their argument is deeply flawed and will have the chance to strengthen it and hopefully learn the cause of decreased visitors on Bridge Bay Beach.
The
writer
of this
argument
is the city manager of
Bridge
Bay
who
is hypothesizing that the beach's
decrease
in
visitors
last
year
is
due
to the ending of their
contract
with
Arko
Trash
Collection
. The
writer
states
that last
year
the
attendance
was 50% lower than the
year
before
when
Arko
Trash
Collection
was working as the garbage collectors. It is
also
stated that nearby
beaches
that continue to
use
Arko
Trash
Collection
are experiencing a high
number
of
visitors
. The
conclusion
of the writer's
argument
is that in
order
to
increase
visitors
to
Bridge
Bay, they
need
to fire the new garbage collectors Satellite Waste Corporation and resume
contract
with
Arko
Trash
collection
. The author's
argument
is a
good
attempt to figure out why
attendance
has decreased
but
it is not a valid or reliable
argument
due
to the writer's lack of evidence,
use
of questionable
assumptions
and vague terminology; in
order
to have a reasonable
argument
the
author
needs
to answer
many
questions which will be
presented
in this essay.

It
is stated
that the
attendance
of the
Bridge
Beach
by
visitors
was 50% lower last
year
than the
year
before
. The
author
then
states
that this is
due
to the ending of the
contract
with
Arko
and the beginning of a new
contract
with Satellite. In
order
for this
assumption
to
be validated
, the
author
should address questions and define the vague terms
used
. To
begin
, how was the
number
50% collected? It would be helpful for the
writer
to
state
whether this
was collected
through a reliable survey,
because
if this
number
was collected
from weekend
visitors
two years
before
and then collected from weekday
visitors
this past
year
, the
number
decrease
would not be comparable.
Additionally
, the reader of this
argument
needs
to know the
amount
of
trash
that
was collected
in both years that are
being compared
.
For example
, what if two years ago the
amount
of
trash
was the same as the last
year
but
in the last
year
many
new
beaches
opened up in the area? This would suggest that the
decrease
in
visitors
was not
due
to the
change
in
trash
collectors
but
rather
due
to
changes
in the greater community.

The
writer
continues to back up the
conclusion
with questionable
assumptions
when it
is stated
that
Ocean
Harbor
, a nearby
beach
, that
still
uses
Arko
has
&quot
; record levels of
attendance
.
&quot
; The
author
uses
this statement in an attempt to prove that the higher levels of
visitors
are
due
to
Arko
being the
trash
collectors,
but
again there is no evidence that the higher level of
visitors
is
due
to there being less
trash
. The
writer
needs
to again
provide
statistics on the
amount
of
trash
collected by
Arko
at
Ocean
Harbor
and
provide
details
on the
current
state
of the
beach
.
For example
, what if
Ocean
Harbor
beach
has more
visitors
this
year
due
to the fact that they
added
rides and a boardwalk full of games? What if
Ocean
Harbor
has calmer waters and offers a full bar and
beach
side food services? This could be the real reason why
Ocean
Harbor
has more
visitors
and why
Bridge
Bay's
visitor
numbers
have dropped. If the
author
describes
the amenities present at each
beach
and it
is proven
that their amenities are then same, then demonstrates that there is more
trash
per square foot on
Bridge
Bay
beach
than on
Ocean
Harbor
with valid statistics, then the
argument
would be
stronger
and reasonable;
sadly
, though, this is not the case in the
argument
presented.

Finally
the
author
uses
the
argument
that there have been an
increase
in
complaints
about garbage on
Bridge
Bay this past
year
. The
author
forgets to
add
vital information here in
order
to
successfully
use
this statement as proof to the
conclusion
.
Who
were those
who
complained? What if the
increase
in
complaints
of
trash
on the
beach
is from one single person
who
calls every day or multiple times a day? In
order
to have a
stronger
argument
and
use
the
complaints
as proof that the
decrease
in
visitors
is
due
to an
increase
in
trash
, the
writer
needs
to
provide
details
on the content of the
complaints
, and how
many
people
are complaining.

In
conclusion
, it is
important
to address the garbage problem present on
many
beaches
.
In
this
argument
, the city manager of
Bridge
Bay
makes
an unsubstantiated claim that their
decrease
in
visitors
last
year
is
due
to changing garbage
collection
agencies. The
argument
presented
is not reasonable or reliable as the terms are vague and the
assumptions
presented
have no validity or evidence to back them up. If the
writer
provides
the reader with a comparison in
amount
of
trash
on the
Bridge
Bay
beach
in both years
being compared
and connects it to a
decrease
in
visitors
then the
argument
would be
stronger
. The
writer
additionally
cannot
successfully
compare
Bridge
Bay
beach
to
Ocean
Harbor
beach
without discussing the amenities provided in both
beaches
and the
amount
of
trash
present per square foot.
Finally
the
writer
should
provide
more
details
about
who
is making
complaints
and what the content of the
complaints
are in
order
to have a
stronger
argument
. With more research and work to answer the
presented
questions, the city manager will discover that their
argument
is
deeply
flawed and will have the chance to strengthen it and
hopefully
learn the cause of decreased
visitors
on
Bridge
Bay
Beach
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The following is a recommendation from the city manager of Bridge Bay. “Last year, the number of visits to our local beach in Bridge Bay was 50 percent lowerthan the year before. Early last year we ended our contract with Arko Trash Collection, acompany

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
914 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: