Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Because the future will be dominated by technology we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students If our students take these classes they ll all be able to get high paying programming jobs and lead fulfilling lives

Because the future will be dominated by technology we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students If our students take these classes they ll all be able to get high paying programming jobs and lead fulfilling lives OVwQE
The argument is flawed for numerous reasons. Primarily, the argument is not cogent because it assumes that technology will dominate the future but has not provide any evidence on this fact and hence not valid. The entire argument is based on the idea that technology is going to dominate the future to come. But it is difficult to understand the way in which direction the future will go. For example, people living in the period of agricultural era may have though that agriculture would always thrive and hence they wanted to teach their successors about the very basic of agriculture. But industrialization supplanted agriculture based society as did technology replaced industrialization. So how can it not be said that in the near future another topic is going to rule other than technology? However, the argument casts generalization about the study curriculum of students. But by birth the understanding capacity of children varies. There may be some students who are not good at math and logic but humanity related subjects attract them. If the curriculum enjoins them to pursue their education on computer programming it is crystal clear that they are not going to be succeed. So generalization on study curriculum is a flawed idea. Again the argument assumes that after completing the computer course students are going to get high-paying programming jobs. But the term high-paying is vague for the fact that it can be true that a programmer, for example, makes an amount of one thousand USD monthly. However, the median earning of all people in that certain region is over one million USD. So had the argument discussed in details about the median value of the income only then the argument would be more valid. Again, mere theoretical education doesn't guarantee that a student will be successful as a programmer because successful in a particular career depends on a number of things such as: communication skill, ability to work in a group. However, the argument assumes that software related jobs will thrive the job sector in the near future but it is possible to occur a recession and this economical downfall may shrink the job sectors of software engineers and data scientists. The argument assumes that programming is needed in every aspect of life and hence the education of programming is going to be beneficial, which is not true. For example, a civil engineer who designs building should have the knowledge of basic structural analysis and reinforced concrete. It is true that he will use some soft wares while designing but it is not necessary that he should have the very concept how the software runs, how the core programming is done. The argument is flawed for some unwarranted assumptions it make.
The
argument
is flawed
for numerous reasons.
Primarily
, the
argument
is not cogent
because
it
assumes
that
technology
will dominate the
future
but
has not
provide
any evidence on this fact and
hence
not valid.

The entire
argument
is based
on the
idea
that
technology
is going to dominate the
future
to
come
.
But
it is difficult to understand the way in which direction the
future
will go.
For example
,
people
living in the period of agricultural era may have though that agriculture would always thrive and
hence
they wanted to teach their successors about the
very
basic of agriculture.
But
industrialization supplanted agriculture based society as did
technology
replaced industrialization.
So
how can it not
be said
that in the near
future
another topic is going to
rule
other than
technology
?
However
, the
argument
casts generalization about the study curriculum of
students
.
But
by birth the understanding capacity of children varies. There may be
some
students
who are not
good
at math and logic
but
humanity related subjects attract them.
If
the curriculum enjoins them to pursue their education on computer
programming
it is crystal
clear
that they are not going to be
succeed
.
So
generalization on study curriculum is a flawed
idea
.

Again the
argument
assumes
that after completing the computer course
students
are going to
get
high-paying
programming
jobs
.
But
the term high-paying is vague for the fact that it can be true that a programmer,
for example
,
makes
an amount of one thousand USD monthly.
However
, the median earning of all
people
in that certain region is over one million USD.
So
had the
argument
discussed in
details
about the median value of the income
only
then the
argument
would be more valid. Again, mere theoretical education doesn't guarantee that a
student
will be successful as a programmer
because
successful in a particular career depends on a number of things such as: communication
skill
, ability to work in a group.
However
, the
argument
assumes
that software related
jobs
will thrive the
job
sector in the near
future
but
it is possible to occur a recession and this economical downfall may shrink the
job
sectors of software engineers and data scientists.

The
argument
assumes
that
programming
is needed
in every aspect of life and
hence
the education of
programming
is going to be beneficial, which is not true.
For example
, a civil engineer who designs building should have the knowledge of basic structural analysis and reinforced concrete. It is true that he will
use
some
soft wares while designing
but
it is not necessary that he should have the
very
concept how the software runs, how the core
programming
is done
.

The
argument
is flawed
for
some
unwarranted assumptions it
make
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Because the future will be dominated by technology we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students If our students take these classes they ll all be able to get high paying programming jobs and lead fulfilling lives

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
454 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: