In this fast-paced world, people tend to live alone and this trend is increasing. There are various causes behind this behaviour. A section of society is convinced that this approach will have a negative impact on the community. Whereas, the others tend to differ from this school of thought. In my opinion, I agree with the former point of view.
The principal rationale for masses to stay independent is monetary benefits. Nowadays, both males and females are the bread winner of a family, which enables them to look after themselves. For instance, one of the extensive researches conducted by the UK government illustrated that the eighty percent of their population is living in silos because of their high income. The second main cause is a sedentary lifestyle. Owing to this lifestyle, people have become lazy to manage a family. For example, one of the studies conducted by the World Health Organization demonstrated that the major reason for people to prefer to lead an independent life is because of laziness caused by the modern lifestyle. Consequently, the causes for living alone is monetary benefits and sedentary lifestyle.
Undoubtedly, the concept of leading an isolated life will impact the country negatively. Firstly, the student population in a country reduces, which is not good for any country to burgeon and reach the pinnacle. Like the UK government is now looking for younger immigrants to fund them via taxes, as only twenty percent of their crowd is under working age group. Secondly, independent way of approaching a life makes them grow lazier. As a result, laziness and under population will not help any country to spread their wings and embrace victory.
In conclusion, my strong conviction is that independent way of living will negatively impact a nation by making them unfit and drastically reduces the population. Living in a family always brings positivity in one's life.
In this
fast
-paced world,
people
tend to
live
alone and this trend is increasing. There are various causes behind this
behaviour
. A section of society
is convinced
that this approach will have a
negative
impact on the community.
Whereas
, the others tend to differ from this school of
thought
. In my opinion, I
agree
with the former point of view.
The principal rationale for masses to stay
independent
is monetary benefits. Nowadays, both males and females are the bread winner of a family, which enables them to look after themselves.
For instance
, one of the extensive researches conducted by the UK
government
illustrated that the eighty percent of their
population
is
living
in silos
because
of their high income. The second main cause is a sedentary lifestyle. Owing to this lifestyle,
people
have become lazy to manage a family.
For example
, one of the studies conducted by the World Health Organization demonstrated that the major reason for
people
to prefer to lead an
independent
life
is
because
of laziness caused by the modern lifestyle.
Consequently
, the causes for
living
alone is monetary benefits and sedentary lifestyle.
Undoubtedly
, the concept of leading an isolated
life
will impact the
country
negatively
.
Firstly
, the student
population
in a
country
reduces
, which is not
good
for any
country
to burgeon and reach the pinnacle. Like the UK
government
is
now
looking for younger immigrants to fund them via taxes, as
only
twenty percent of their crowd is under working age group.
Secondly
,
independent
way of approaching a
life
makes
them grow lazier.
As a result
, laziness and under
population
will not
help
any
country
to spread their wings and embrace victory.
In conclusion
, my strong conviction is that
independent
way of
living
will
negatively
impact a nation by making them unfit and
drastically
reduces
the
population
.
Living
in a family always brings positivity in one's
life
.