It is an alarming issue that environmental degradation has become more severe. While the government and enterprises should take their responsibilites for reducing the damage, I believe that individuals also aid to ameliorate the situation.
On the one hand, the government and companies should place a high priority on alleviating the problems. From the government’s perspective, they might implement environmentally-friendly rules and regulations to cut down the contamination. For example, by imposing green taxes on commuters and fostering public transports usages, the volume of traffic declines, meaning that exhaust fumes which play a vital role in global warming significantly diminish. Similarly, large companies should counteract environmental destruction due to their adverse impacts on air, water and land qualities. Instead of consuming fossil fuel resulting in polluted emission, chemical pesticides leading to destroy the ecological balance, they should invest in alternative energy sources and organic products. Not only do these actions ease the damage but they also help to achieve a sustainable development.
On the other hand, just few individuals also can reduce the negative effects on the environment. They can join one of the organizations which form part of the green movement, in order to campaign for people awareness. Residents should abide by the rules of pollution reduction such as no smoking at public places. Additionally, customers are encouraged to replace plastic material on reusable one in packaging. This will slash the vast amount of waste which does not break down easily after years.
In conclusion, it is true that the government and large companies should take draconian measures; however, I opine that law-abiding citizens also have a huge influence on environmental protection.
It is an alarming issue that environmental degradation has become more severe. While the
government
and enterprises should take their
responsibilites
for reducing the damage, I believe that individuals
also
aid to ameliorate the situation.
On the one hand, the
government
and
companies
should place a high priority on alleviating the problems. From the
government’s
perspective, they might implement
environmentally
-friendly
rules
and regulations to
cut
down the contamination.
For example
, by imposing green taxes on commuters and fostering public transports usages, the volume of traffic declines, meaning that exhaust fumes which play a vital role in global warming
significantly
diminish.
Similarly
, large
companies
should counteract environmental destruction due to their adverse impacts on air, water and land qualities.
Instead
of consuming fossil fuel resulting in polluted emission, chemical pesticides leading to
destroy
the ecological balance, they should invest in alternative energy sources and organic products. Not
only
do these actions
ease
the damage
but
they
also
help
to achieve a sustainable development.
On the other hand
,
just
few individuals
also
can
reduce
the
negative
effects on the environment. They can
join
one of the organizations which form part of the green movement, in order to campaign for
people
awareness. Residents should abide by the
rules
of pollution reduction such as no smoking at public places.
Additionally
, customers
are encouraged
to replace plastic material on reusable one in packaging. This will slash the vast amount of waste which does not break down
easily
after years.
In conclusion
, it is true that the
government
and large
companies
should take
draconian
measures;
however
, I opine that law-abiding citizens
also
have a huge influence on environmental protection.