The issue related to countries allocating more funds to renovating buildings in poor condition has been heatedly debated by the population. Some feel that the amount of money invested in reparation is significant for the educational and cultural system. However, I totally agree with those who say that national budgets should prioritize the creation of modern spaces instead of repairing old structures because, even though it aids in children's historical knowledge, newer buildings are environmentally friendlier than in the past.
Although one side of the argument claims that fixing a historic building has an impact on children’s education, it does not address environmental effects. Firstly, people often have this opinion because the history of an older building plays a role in society through history classes. Furthermore, the conservation of historical façades is done to protect the culture as a legacy for the next generation. To illustrate, children that are attending kindergarten can learn about modern art visiting those buildings, because they can absorb more visual information while they are physically there instead of listening passively in a classroom. Therefore, observing monuments are an educational strategy to increase their artistic skills. However, none of these points help to improve the environment.
More importantly, demolishing old structures and erecting new buildings can have many positive effects on the cities’ environment. The main reason is the majority of old construction is not designed to be sustainable. Moreover, old infrastructure has a high cost of maintenance due to the inefficient heating system. It is also essential to point out that when there is a project to construct a green building, it is carried out in an eco-friendly way. An example of this is the new houses in Toronto, located near the Yonge–Eglinton area, which are not only using solar energy panels to save heat in the winter season, but are also decreasing the amount of carbon emissions. Thus, it is evident that moving forward, these types of modern buildings will only benefit a society as opposed to the old, dilapidated infrastructure from the past.
To sum up, despite both arguments having their merits, I believe investing in new areas should take priority over fixing old buildings because the new architecture brings ecological benefits. As I have mentioned, it is recommended that the society increase funds to invest in places that generate clean electricity and lower maintenance costs.
The issue related to countries allocating more funds to renovating
buildings
in poor condition has been
heatedly
debated by the population.
Some
feel that the amount of money invested in reparation is significant for the educational and cultural system.
However
, I
totally
agree
with those who say that national budgets should prioritize the creation of modern spaces
instead
of repairing
old
structures
because
,
even though
it aids in children's historical knowledge, newer
buildings
are
environmentally
friendlier than in the past.
Although one side of the argument claims that fixing a historic
building
has an impact on children’s education, it does not address environmental effects.
Firstly
,
people
often
have this opinion
because
the history of an older
building
plays a role in society through history classes.
Furthermore
, the conservation of historical façades
is done
to protect the culture as a legacy for the
next
generation. To illustrate, children that are attending kindergarten can learn about modern art visiting those
buildings
,
because
they can absorb more visual information while they are
physically
there
instead
of listening
passively
in a classroom.
Therefore
, observing monuments are an educational strategy to increase their artistic
skills
.
However
, none of these points
help
to
improve
the environment.
More
importantly
, demolishing
old
structures and erecting
new
buildings
can have
many
positive
effects on the cities’ environment. The main reason is the majority of
old
construction is not designed to be sustainable.
Moreover
,
old
infrastructure has a high cost of maintenance due to the inefficient heating system. It is
also
essential to point out that when there is a project to construct a green
building
, it
is carried
out
in an eco-friendly way
. An example of this is the
new
houses
in Toronto, located near the
Yonge
–
Eglinton
area, which are not
only
using solar energy panels to save heat in
the winter season
,
but
are
also
decreasing the amount of carbon emissions.
Thus
, it is evident that moving forward, these types of modern
buildings
will
only
benefit a society as opposed to the
old
, dilapidated infrastructure from the past.
To sum up, despite both arguments having their merits, I believe investing in
new
areas should take priority over fixing
old
buildings
because
the
new
architecture brings ecological benefits. As I have mentioned, it
is recommended
that the society increase funds to invest in places that generate clean electricity and lower maintenance costs.