It is a true statement “Travel is the only thing you buy that makes you richer”. An Income of the world has been the highest per capita in the last decade, more travellers are visiting a range of tourist destinations than ever before. It is a growing perception that English will soon become the only spoken linguistic globally. I opine that the English language has been a boon for the tourism industry, and aid to economic growth for the various countries. However, it would certainly be at the expense of certain Indigenous tribes and their languages.
On the one hand, English can act as a sole communication channel, and playing an imperative role in the international tourism industry. If everyone can speak one language, there would be a complete understanding between not only cultures as well as all people throughout the world, which will boost the learning flow of the information, and ideas. Another pivotal factor of a single linguistic would be that it can aid economic growth. Eventually, with all people talking the same speech, fewer language barriers will develop better trade relations and thriving economies.
On the other hand, many people think that leaning on a single mode of communication can affect tourism and could be the biggest drawback for developing nations. Firstly, it is certainly challenging for tribal societies to grasp a second language while traditionally overlooking their local values to earn livings. In a particular survey of communication barrier in native tribes, the aborigines of Australia have struggled to adapt the English language for good fifty years after the arrival of Europeans. Secondly, depending on one language can impact the local language, and dialects to become extinct. Therefore, if people will squander time in adapting one linguistic it might affect their social and cultural norms.
In conclusion, while there are merits to having one global language, too much would be lost as a sequel. Maintaining local languages and cultures should be prioritized to ensure a rich world heritage for future generations. 
It is a true statement “Travel is the  
only
 thing you  
buy
 that  
makes
 you richer”. An Income of the world has been the highest per capita in the last decade, more  
travellers
 are visiting a range of tourist destinations than ever  
before
. It is a growing perception that English will  
soon
 become the  
only
 spoken linguistic globally. I opine that the English  
language
 has been a boon for the tourism industry, and aid to economic growth for the various countries.  
However
, it would  
certainly
 be at the expense of certain Indigenous tribes and their languages.
On the one hand, English can act as a sole communication channel, and playing an imperative role in the international tourism industry. If everyone can speak one  
language
, there would be a complete understanding between not  
only
 cultures  
as well
 as all  
people
 throughout the world, which will boost the learning flow of the information, and  
ideas
. Another pivotal factor of a single linguistic would be that it can aid economic growth.  
Eventually
, with all  
people
 talking the same speech, fewer  
language
 barriers will develop better trade relations and thriving economies. 
On the other hand
,  
many
  people
  think
 that leaning on a single mode of communication can affect tourism and could be the biggest drawback for developing nations.  
Firstly
, it is  
certainly
 challenging for tribal societies to grasp a second  
language
 while  
traditionally
 overlooking their local values to earn livings. In a particular survey of communication barrier in native tribes, the aborigines of Australia have struggled to adapt the English  
language
 for  
good
 fifty years after the arrival of Europeans.  
Secondly
, depending on one  
language
 can impact the local  
language
, and dialects to become extinct.  
Therefore
, if  
people
 will squander time in adapting one linguistic it might affect their social and cultural norms. 
In conclusion
, while there are merits to having one global  
language
, too much would  
be lost
 as a sequel. Maintaining local  
languages
 and cultures should  
be prioritized
 to ensure a rich world heritage for future generations.