The column graph shows the rate of consumers in three age group taking healthy food between 2011 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant v.1
The column graph shows the rate of consumers in three age group taking healthy food between 2011 and 2016
It is considered by some that university students should choose their own major, while others think that they should be limited to subjects that are beneficial in the future. Although these subjects are important, I believe that students should be free to learn whatever subject they want.
On the one hand, some people argue that students ought to be free to choose their field, and I agree. If they are forced to study a certain subject, it would stifle their creativity and doom them to fail. However, studying a major that they love allows them to be creative and succeed. For example, if a student is talented in art, it would be unfair to waste their talent and force them to study science. Another benefit is that countries need all professions and restricting students to certain fields can destroy the balance in the job market. In order for a country to thrive, it needs designers, doctors, mechanics, farmers, as well as artists.
On the other hand, others think that students should only learn subjects that are useful in the future. Due to the heavy reliance on technology nowadays, there are more job opportunities for scientists. As a consequence, science and IT graduates can get good jobs and earn high salaries. Furthermore, it can improve the economic progress of countries since scientists are the driving force of companies. For instance, if there are more science and IT graduates, then more businesses would flourish due to having qualified employees. However, studying these subjects only has severe consequences as the job market will lose its balance.
In conclusion, while people have varying perspectives, I believe that allowing students to follow their passion and learn what they love is more advantageous than restricting them to science and technology.
It
is considered
by
some
that university
students
should choose their
own
major, while others
think
that they should
be limited
to
subjects
that are beneficial in the future. Although these
subjects
are
important
, I believe that
students
should be free to learn whatever
subject
they want.
On the one hand,
some
people
argue that
students
ought to be free to choose their field, and I
agree
. If they
are forced
to study a certain
subject
, it would stifle their creativity and doom them to fail.
However
, studying a major that they
love
allows
them to be creative and succeed.
For example
, if a
student
is talented
in art, it would be unfair to waste their talent and force them to study
science
. Another benefit is that countries need all professions and restricting
students
to certain fields can
destroy
the balance in the
job
market. In order for a country to thrive, it needs designers, doctors, mechanics, farmers,
as well
as artists.
On the other hand
, others
think
that
students
should
only
learn
subjects
that are useful in the future. Due to the heavy reliance on technology nowadays, there are more
job
opportunities for scientists. As a consequence,
science
and IT graduates can
get
good
jobs
and earn high salaries.
Furthermore
, it can
improve
the economic progress of countries since scientists are the driving force of
companies
.
For instance
, if there are more
science
and IT graduates, then more businesses would flourish due to having qualified employees.
However
, studying these
subjects
only
has severe consequences as the
job
market will lose its balance.
In conclusion
, while
people
have varying perspectives, I believe that allowing
students
to follow their passion and learn what they
love
is more advantageous than restricting them to
science
and technology.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes