The cave paintings of Lascaux
The cave paintings of Lascaux eAyXA
The article aruges that ensuring a successful hunt is purpose of the cave paintings of Lascaux. In response, the professor redutes this idea by expalining that the the author's presented us little supports.
Frist, the author supports his argument by indicating that the subjects of the paintings of Lascaux are large animals that were very important for prehistoric hunters, and there are some animal wounded by arrows in the paintings. However, the professor tells us that many of the animals in the painting are not anilmals that are haunted. In fact, there are animals like cats and dinasours in the paintings too. Moreover, liitle arrows are shown in the paintings. Therefore, the author's cliam rejected.
Second, the article puts forth his idea by explaining that there are human figures with animal heads in the paintings which indicates there were hunters. In contrast, the professor refutes the idea of author by highlighting that the animal heads human figures are not shown in the hunting postion. In fact, these human figures are not in the satnding postion at all and are in sleep postion. In addition, there are no another picture around them, which makes difficult to interperate these animal heads human figures.
Third, the reading explain that the paintings were depicting, as one of an old belief of many cultures, in purpose of bringing an event to reality. In response, the professor refutes this idea by explaining that the paintings would have been depicted for diffrent magical cermonies too. He explains that in another magical cermony people depict the animal to communicate with their anssectors. Therefore, the author's reason does not convincing. 
The article  
aruges
 that ensuring a successful hunt is purpose of the cave  
paintings
 of Lascaux. In response, the  
professor
  redutes
 this  
idea
 by  
expalining
 that  
the the
 author's presented us  
little
 supports. 
Frist
, the author supports his argument by indicating that the subjects of the  
paintings
 of Lascaux are large  
animals
 that were  
very
  important
 for prehistoric hunters, and there are  
some
  animal
 wounded by arrows in the  
paintings
.  
However
, the  
professor
  tells
 us that  
many
 of the  
animals
 in the  
painting
 are not  
anilmals
 that  
are haunted
. In fact, there are  
animals
 like cats and  
dinasours
 in the  
paintings
 too.  
Moreover
,  
liitle
 arrows  
are shown
 in the  
paintings
.  
Therefore
, the author's  
cliam
 rejected.
Second, the article puts forth his  
idea
 by explaining that there are  
human
 figures with  
animal
 heads in the  
paintings
 which indicates there were hunters.  
In contrast
, the  
professor
 refutes the  
idea
 of author by highlighting that the  
animal
 heads  
human
 figures are not shown in the hunting  
postion
. In fact, these  
human
 figures are not in the  
satnding
  postion
 at all and are in sleep  
postion
.  
In
 addition, there are  
no
 another  
picture
 around them, which  
makes
 difficult to  
interperate
 these  
animal
 heads  
human
 figures.
Third, the reading  
explain
 that the  
paintings
 were depicting, as one of an  
old
 belief of  
many
 cultures, in purpose of bringing an  
event
 to reality. In response, the  
professor
 refutes this  
idea
 by explaining that the  
paintings
 would have  
been depicted
 for  
diffrent
 magical  
cermonies
 too. He  
explains
 that in another magical  
cermony
  people
 depict the  
animal
 to communicate with their  
anssectors
.  
Therefore
, the author's reason does not  
convincing
.