Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The British And Australian Laws The Jury Has No Access To The Past Criminal Record Of The Defendant

The British And Australian Laws The Jury Has No Access To The Past Criminal Record Of The Defendant pRKjd
It is believed, and rightly so, that a person learns from his past and makes his future bright by correcting the mistakes committed in the past. Due to this, a person should not be judged, as a whole, by his past deeds only. Due the weightage must be accorded to the present circumstances in which the person commits an act, which may either give a positive or a negative result. Different nations across the globe have a different set of rules in respect of criminal cases that come across the jury of such nation. The jury under the British and Australian laws has no access as regards the past criminal record of a defendant. This provides an edge to the defendant, as the jury comes to a decision in a vacuum. Moreover, in absence of previous criminal records the jury does not arrive at a decision due to any biasedness or pre-conceived notion about the character of the defendant. This situation, undoubtedly, favours the defendant. However, another school of thought believes that the jury must be aware of the past criminal records of the defendant. According to the believers of this school, an access to the past criminal records, actually provides a factual, realistic and reasonable platform to the jury to deliver their judgment. The past records, as a matter of fact, provides the insight into nature, character, upbringing, social level, mental health and numerous other factors of the defendant. With the help of these tools, it becomes easy and logical for the jury to read the subconscious mind of such defendant. Moreover, it also facilitates the jury to take a reasoned, well defined, appropriate, conscious, deliberate, judicious and prudent decision. As a matter of fact, in the recent case of a known gangster that made headlines in the criminal magazine, The ABC, it was only due to the knowledge of modus operandi of the said gangster in past records, that the jury overruled the theory of reasonable doubt that was illusioned by the advocate of the defendant. In short, in my opinion, the jury must be made aware of the past records to provide them the opportunity to have a full 360-degree view of the defendant, as a whole.
It
is believed
, and
rightly
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
, that a person learns from his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
his future bright by correcting the mistakes committed in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Due
to this, a person should not
be judged
, as a whole, by his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
deeds
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
.
It appears that a preposition is missing after 'Due'.
Due the
weightage
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be accorded
to the present circumstances in which the person commits an act, which may either give a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
or a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
result.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Different
nations across the globe have a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
set of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
in respect of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
cases that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
come
across the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
of such nation. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
under the British and Australian laws has no access as regards the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
record
of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
defendant
. This
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
provides
an edge to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
defendant
, as the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
comes
to a decision in a vacuum.
Moreover
, in absence of previous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
records
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
does not arrive at a decision
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
due
to any
Possible spelling mistake found.
biasedness
or
Possible spelling mistake found.
pre-conceived
notion about the character of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
defendant
. This situation,
undoubtedly
,
Possible spelling mistake. 'favours' is British English.
favours
the defendant.

However
, another school of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
believes that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be aware of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
records
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
defendant
. According to the believers of this school,
Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply "access".
an access
to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
records
, actually
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
provides
a factual, realistic and reasonable platform to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
to deliver their judgment. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
records
, as a matter of fact,
You should probably use "provide".
provides
the insight into nature, character, upbringing, social level, mental health and numerous other factors of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
defendant
. With the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
of these tools, it becomes easy and logical for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
to read the subconscious mind of such
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
defendant
.
Moreover
, it
also
facilitates the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
to take a reasoned,
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
well defined
, appropriate, conscious, deliberate, judicious and prudent decision.

As a matter of fact, in the recent case of a known gangster that made headlines in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
magazine, The ABC, it was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
due
to the knowledge of modus operandi of the said gangster in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
records
, that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
overruled the theory of reasonable doubt that was
Possible spelling mistake found.
illusioned
by the advocate of the defendant.

In short, in my opinion, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be made
aware of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
records
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
provide
them the opportunity to have a full 360-degree view of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
defendant
, as a whole.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The British And Australian Laws The Jury Has No Access To The Past Criminal Record Of The Defendant

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
370 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts