Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is toincrease the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagreewith this statement? v.1

The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is toincrease the price of fuel. with this statement? v. 1
Excessive traffic and increasing pollution are affecting every major city in the globe. To lessen such problems, some people say that governments should raise the price of fuel such as petrol and diesel. It may help to some extent but I disagree that it is the best solution to solve the problem of environment. To begin with, the number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behaviour in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road is reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on current and prospective car owners, and be detrimental to the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of available transport facilities. Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment. Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the ability to make cell- powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful. To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by increasing the gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more effective solutions.
Excessive traffic and increasing pollution are affecting every major city in the globe. To

lessen such
problems
,
some
people
say that
governments
should raise the price of

fuel
such as petrol and diesel. It may
help
to
some
extent
but
I disagree that it is
the


best
solution to solve the
problem
of environment.

To
begin
with, the number of
cars
in a country
directly
depends on the proportion of

the
population affluent
enough
to
own
cars
.
As a result
, raises in
gas
price
could


invoke
hard
feelings among this segment of
people
but
would not
drastically
change


their
behaviour
in using
cars
.
Even if
the number of
cars
on road is
reduced
due
to


higher
gas
cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic
problems
. Such policy
would


hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on
current
and prospective
car
owners, and

be
detrimental to the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could
be


the construction of better roads and more effective
use
of available transport

facilities
.

Secondly
, there is evidence that waste
gas
from
cars
is not the leading cause of air

pollution
. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into
the


atmosphere
due to the
rapidly
growing manufacturing industry.
As a result
,
reduction


of
the number of
cars
would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could
better


handle this
problem
if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and

adopt
more environmental friendly materials and production equipment.

Finally
, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources

could
also
be a better solution.
For example
, we
now
have the ability to
make
cell-

powered
or even solar-powered
cars
. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, it is not the best way to control traffic

and pollution by increasing the
gas
price
because
such action will hurt consumers and

economy
without achieving what it
is aimed
for. Measures such as construction
of


better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more

effective
solutions.
1Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
16Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
26Mistakes
A foreign language is like a frail, delicate muscle. If you do not use it, it weakens.
Jhumpa Lahiri

IELTS essay The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is toincrease the price of fuel. with this statement? v. 1

Essay
  American English
27 paragraphs
356 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts