It is argued by the majority of individuals today that it is better for citizens to move into the city centre in order to address several problems. Whereas many advocate that this may result in much more effective results, I partly agree with those who oppose this idea.
On the one hand, it appears indisputable that moving from rural areas into city centres can lead to decline in current traffic and pollution. This is mainly because the pace of life as well as technology has accelerated in urban areas. Those who advocate this view feel that the technological advancements seem to be the most efficient way to deal with traffic and pollution as they are able to lessen these two issues. Recycling, which has been becoming significantly common in cities, is not being held in suburbs which now means that there is much more pollution there. With regard to traffic problems, it is true that a very rapid production of automobiles is visible nowadays throughout the world that threatens the existence of humans due to pollution. In cities, however, some restrictions are made in order to deter traffic problems. Speed cameras are being installed in various areas of the city and the full weight of the law has been imposed for serious offences like polluting air.
Despite the aforementioned upsides, I agree with people who are in favour of staying in suburbs and countrysides. They believe that it is of great importance to keep all places less polluted. It is not necessary to move, but every resident should make modest contribution to maintain the stable environment. For instance, it would be a great idea to involve all people in the world to plant trees. It cannot be effective unless all individuals get it serious.
In conclusion, although changing accommodation has some unique merits, it seems to me that it is first essential to allocate more resources and legislate new laws to keep the safe environment.
It
is argued
by the majority of individuals
today
that it is better for citizens to
move
into the city
centre
in order to address several problems. Whereas
many advocate
that this may result in much more effective results, I partly
agree
with those who oppose this
idea
.
On the one hand, it appears indisputable that moving from rural areas into city
centres
can lead to decline in
current
traffic
and
pollution
. This is
mainly
because
the pace of life
as well
as technology has accelerated in urban areas. Those who advocate this view feel that the technological advancements seem to be the most efficient way to deal with
traffic
and
pollution
as they are able to lessen these two issues. Recycling, which has been becoming
significantly
common in
cities
, is not
being held
in suburbs which
now
means that there is much more
pollution
there. With regard to
traffic
problems, it is true that a
very
rapid production of automobiles is visible nowadays throughout the world that threatens the existence of humans due to
pollution
. In
cities
,
however
,
some
restrictions
are made
in order to deter
traffic
problems. Speed cameras are
being installed
in various areas of the city and the full weight of the law has
been imposed
for serious
offences
like polluting air.
Despite the aforementioned upsides, I
agree
with
people
who are in
favour
of staying in suburbs and countrysides. They believe that it is of great importance to
keep
all places less polluted. It is not necessary to
move
,
but
every resident should
make
modest contribution to maintain the stable environment.
For instance
, it would be a great
idea
to involve all
people
in the world to plant trees. It cannot be effective unless all individuals
get
it serious.
In conclusion
, although changing accommodation has
some
unique merits, it seems to me that it is
first
essential to allocate more resources and legislate new laws to
keep
the safe environment.