Burgeoning traffic jam has become a serious concern in metropolitan areas. Some populace opine that equiping 24 by 7 free subway can curb this hurdle in big cities, and it is the best way to stop this menace, however the rest go advese it. In my opinion, I partially agree with the above statement. The following paragraphs would elucidate my personal perspective with an opt example.
I see Eye To Eye with the central idea for many reasons. The first and foremost, the system would entice the dwellers. If higher authorities impart complementary railway to their inhabitants, citizens would use more and more transportation as they would not need to pay any monetary. As a result, these folks can travel anywhere without any cost in turn lesson the traffic congestion on roads. The another pivotal aspect is associated with the time consumption. Unquestionably, more mortals would able to sit in transit, would reach their destination earlier than their own vehicles. To epitome, going Delhi from Punjab would take 5 hours by car, whilst, it would consume only three hours by train. Consequently, one folk can save more than two hours by using public vehicle.
On the logos had some critics go against the above discussed assertions. Primarily, it is not an effective way to reduce this obstacle. Since this system requires a lot of budget, which would put a strain on government. To be more precise, this system would likely to decline the economy of particular nation. Secondly, if government provide free transit to citizens, the amount of tax would be enlarged. Owning to the fact that, in order to run the public services, local authorities would collect fund through taxes. Thus, I must say this is not the effective method
To recapitulate, although there is no doubt that this method would reduce the jams on the roads, I must say other methods can give more effective results.
Burgeoning traffic jam has become a serious concern in metropolitan areas.
Some
populace
opine
that
equiping
24 by 7 free subway can curb this hurdle in
big
cities, and it is the best way to
stop
this menace,
however
the rest go
advese
it. In my opinion, I
partially
agree
with the above statement. The following paragraphs would elucidate my personal perspective with
an opt
example.
I
see
Eye To Eye with the central
idea
for
many
reasons. The
first
and foremost, the system would entice the dwellers. If higher authorities impart complementary railway to their inhabitants, citizens would
use
more and more transportation as they would not need to pay any monetary.
As a result
, these folks can travel anywhere without any cost in turn lesson the traffic congestion on roads. The another pivotal aspect
is associated
with the time consumption.
Unquestionably
, more mortals
would able
to sit in transit, would reach their destination earlier than their
own
vehicles. To epitome, going Delhi from Punjab would take 5 hours by car, whilst, it would consume
only
three hours by train.
Consequently
, one folk can save more than two hours by using public vehicle.
On the logos had
some
critics go against the above discussed assertions.
Primarily
, it is not an effective way to
reduce
this obstacle. Since this system requires
a lot of
budget, which would put a strain on
government
. To be more precise, this system would likely to decline the economy of particular nation.
Secondly
, if
government
provide free transit to citizens, the amount of tax would
be enlarged
. Owning to the fact that, in order to run the public services, local authorities would collect fund through taxes.
Thus
, I
must
say this is not the effective method
To recapitulate, although there is no doubt that this method would
reduce
the jams on the roads, I
must
say other methods can give more effective results.