Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The article introduces Chevalier de Seingalt memoirs.

The article introduces Chevalier de Seingalt memoirs. More specifically, the author discusses how inaccuarte this memoirs are. The lecturer in the listening disagrees. He believes that the memoirs are correct and one of the most reliable historical source. In the reading, the writer begins by stating that Chevalier was not wealthy since he was in need of money and that the evidence showed that he borrowed an ample amount of money from a Swiss merchant. The lecturer, however, disagrees with this viewpoint. He believes taking a loan from the merchant does not mean that he was poor. He acually had properties that he sold to get money and that it takes time to convert it into cash. Therefore in this period he ran out of money and that explains why he borrowed money. The writer also claims that the conversations that was held between Chevalier and the famous writer Voltaire is not that accuarte and that it is impossible to remember the exact phrases and words. Again, the lecturer believes there are flaws in the writer's argumet. He states that Chevalier used to write everything they talked about and kept them so that he can refer to them later and the people who lived with him confirmed that. Another reason why the writer feels that Chevalier is more likely to escape the prison by the help of his political friends who could free him by giving bribes and not through a hole in the ceiling as mentioned in the memoir. The lecturer is doubtful that this is accuarte. He suggest that other prisoners had more powerful friends and could not escape and that bribe could be hard in his case. He goes on to say that after Chevalier escape the ceiling of the cell he was in have been repaired which shows that he acually escaped through the hole in the ceiling. To sum up, both the writer and professor hold conflicting views about the accuracy of Chevalier de Seingalt memoirs. It's clear they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
The article introduces Chevalier de Seingalt
memoirs
. More
specifically
, the author discusses how
inaccuarte
this
memoirs
are.

The
lecturer
in the listening disagrees. He believes that the
memoirs
are correct and one of the most reliable historical source.

In the reading, the
writer
begins
by stating that Chevalier was not wealthy since he was in need of
money
and that the evidence
showed
that he borrowed

an
ample amount of
money
from a Swiss merchant. The
lecturer
,
however
, disagrees with this viewpoint. He believes taking a loan from the merchant
does


not
mean that he was poor. He
acually
had properties that he sold to
get
money
and that it takes time to convert it into cash.
Therefore
in this period

he ran out of
money
and that
explains
why he borrowed money.

The
writer
also
claims that the conversations that
was held
between Chevalier and the
famous
writer
Voltaire is not that
accuarte
and that it is impossible

to
remember the exact phrases and words. Again, the
lecturer
believes there are flaws in the writer's
argumet
. He states that Chevalier
used
to write

everything they talked about and
kept
them
so
that he can refer to them later and the
people
who
lived
with him confirmed that.

Another reason why the
writer
feels that Chevalier is more likely to escape the prison by the
help
of his political friends who could free him by giving

bribes and not through a hole in the ceiling as mentioned in the
memoir
. The
lecturer
is doubtful that this is
accuarte
. He
suggest
that other
prisoners


had
more powerful friends and could not escape and that bribe could be
hard
in his case. He goes on to say that after Chevalier escape the ceiling
of


the
cell he was in have
been repaired
which
shows
that he
acually
escaped through the hole in the ceiling.

To sum up, both the
writer
and professor hold conflicting views about the accuracy of Chevalier de Seingalt
memoirs
. It's
clear
they will have trouble

finding common ground on this issue.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The article introduces Chevalier de Seingalt memoirs.

Essay
  American English
11 paragraphs
343 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts